| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| ECS-565 | ECS-565-O500 | Methods of Observation | 60.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (69.00%) | Approaching (74.00%) | Acceptable (87.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Criteria | 100.0% |
| Anecdotal Records | 10.0% | Not addressed. | The description of anecdotal records is flawed. An incomplete or unrealistic explanation of the environment you would use anecdotal records in is given. | The description of anecdotal records is vague. An underdeveloped explanation of the environment you would use anecdotal records in is given. | The description of anecdotal records is detailed and logical. A clear explanation of the environment you would use anecdotal records in is given. | The description of anecdotal records is comprehensive and thorough. The explanation of the environment in which anecdotal records are used demonstrates best practices. |
| Running Records | 10.0% | Not addressed. | The description of running records is flawed. An incomplete or unrealistic explanation of the environment you would use running records in is given. | The description of running records is vague. An underdeveloped explanation of the environment you would use running records in is given. | The description of running records is detailed and logical. A clear explanation of the environment you would use running records in is given. | The description of running records is comprehensive and thorough. The explanation of the environment you would use running records in demonstrates best practices. |
| Checklists | 10.0% | Not addressed. | The description of checklists is flawed. An incomplete or unrealistic explanation of the environment you would use checklists in is given. | The description of checklists is vague. An underdeveloped explanation of the environment you would use checklists in is given. | The description of checklists is detailed and logical. A clear explanation of the environment you would use checklists in is given. | The description of checklists is comprehensive and thorough. The explanation of the environment you would use checklists in demonstrates best practices. |
| Rating Scales | 10.0% | Not addressed. | The description of rating scales is flawed. An incomplete or unrealistic explanation of the environment you would use rating scales in is given. | The description of rating scales is vague. An underdeveloped explanation of the environment you would use rating scales in is given. | The description of rating scales is detailed and logical. A clear explanation of the environment you would use rating scales in is given. | The description of rating scales is comprehensive and thorough. The explanation of the environment you would use rating scales in demonstrates best practices. |
| Event Sampling | 10.0% | Not addressed. | The description of event sampling is flawed. An incomplete or unrealistic explanation of the environment you would use event sampling in is given. | The description of event sampling is vague. An underdeveloped explanation of the environment you would use event sampling in is given. | The description of event sampling is detailed and logical. A clear explanation of the environment you would use event sampling in is given. | The description of event sampling is comprehensive and thorough. The explanation of the environment you would use event sampling in demonstrates best practices. |
| Time Sample | 10.0% | Not addressed. | The description of time sample is flawed. An incomplete or unrealistic explanation of the environment you would use time sample in is given. | The description of time sample is vague. An underdeveloped explanation of the environment you would use time sample in is given. | The description of time sample is detailed and logical. A clear explanation of the environment you would use time sample in is given. | The description of time sample is comprehensive and thorough. The explanation of the environment you would use time sample in demonstrates best practices. |
| Reflection of Observation Method | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Reflection does not present enough information to discuss which observation method was chosen. An incomplete or irrelevant description of the importance of conducting ongoing formative child, family, and setting assessments to monitor instructional effectiveness is given. | Reflection insignificantly discusses which observation method would be used and why it would be most appropriate. There is a vague description of the importance of conducting ongoing formative child, family, and setting assessments to monitor instructional effectiveness. | Reflection discusses which observation method would be used and why it would be most appropriate. A detailed and relevant description of the importance of conducting ongoing formative child, family, and setting assessments to monitor instructional effectiveness. | Reflection thoroughly discusses which observation method would be used and why it would be most appropriate. An in-depth and thought provoking description of the importance of conducting ongoing formative child, family, and setting assessments to monitor instructional effectiveness. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Mechanical errors or typos are present, and can be distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are inconsistent. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
K_Coromandel
Rubric_Print_Format2.xlsx
