Health Assessment Topic Reflection 3( Pulmonary, Cardiac, Peripheral Vascular, and Lymphatic Systems)

profilealeena28
Rubric_Print_Format2.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
NUR-643E NUR-643E-O502 Health Assessment Topic Reflection 3 10.0
Criteria Percentage 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) 2: Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%) 3: Satisfactory (88.00%) 4: Good (92.00%) 5: Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 85.0%
Reflection Experience 35.0% A description of the experience the student encountered when viewing the assessment is not included. A description of the experience the student encountered when viewing the assessment is incomplete or incorrect. A description of the experience the student encountered when viewing the assessment is included but lacks supporting detail. A description of the experience the student encountered when viewing the assessment is complete and includes supporting detail. A description of the experience the student encountered when viewing the assessment is extremely thorough and includes substantial detail.
Difficulties 35.0% A discussion of the specific difficulties or questions that student has pertaining to the specific part of the assessment is not included. A discussion of the specific difficulties or questions that student has pertaining to the specific part of the assessment is incomplete or incorrect. A discussion of the specific difficulties or questions that student has pertaining to the specific part of the assessment is included but lacks supporting detail. A discussion of the specific difficulties or questions that student has pertaining to the specific part of the assessment is complete and includes supporting detail. A discussion of the specific difficulties or questions that student has pertaining to the specific part of the assessment is extremely thorough and includes substantial detail.
Christian Worldview 15.0% A description of how the Christian worldview and compassion for all plays a role in this type of assessment is not included. A description of how the Christian worldview and compassion for all plays a role in this type of assessment is incomplete or incorrect. A description of how the Christian worldview and compassion for all plays a role in this type of assessment is included but lacks supporting detail. A description of how the Christian worldview and compassion for all plays a role in this type of assessment is complete and includes supporting detail. A description of how the Christian worldview and compassion for all plays a role in this type of assessment is extremely thorough and includes substantial detail.
Organization and Effectiveness 5.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format 10.0%
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%