| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| INT-244 | INT-244-O500 | Christianity and Other Religions | 105.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (65.00%) | Satisfactory (75.00%) | Good (85.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 85.0% |
| Distinguishing Features of Christianity and Other Religions | 10.0% | Worksheet does not explain what sets biblical Christianity apart from other religions. | Worksheet unclearly explains what sets biblical Christianity apart from other religions. | Worksheet explains what sets biblical Christianity apart from other religions. | Worksheet clearly and thoroughly explains what sets biblical Christianity apart from other religions. | Worksheet clearly, insightfully, and thoroughly explains what sets biblical Christianity apart from other religions. |
| Christian Dialogue With Other Religions | 10.0% | Worksheet does not examine if Christian dialogue with other religious traditions is part of the calling to proclaim the gospel of the kingdom. Worksheet lacks relevant references. | Worksheet incompletely examines if Christian dialogue with other religious traditions is part of the calling to proclaim the gospel of the kingdom. References minimally support position taken. | Worksheet clearly examines if Christian dialogue with other religious traditions is part of the calling to proclaim the gospel of the kingdom. References support position taken. | Worksheet clearly and thoroughly examines if Christian dialogue with other religious traditions is part of the calling to proclaim the gospel of the kingdom. References support the position taken. | Worksheet clearly and thoroughly examines if Christian dialogue with other religious traditions is part of the calling to proclaim the gospel of the kingdom. References are appropriate and skillfully support position taken. |
| Learning From Other Religions | 10.0% | Worksheet does not examine what Christians can learn from other religious traditions. Worksheet lacks relevant references. | Worksheet incompletely examines what Christians can learn from other religious traditions. References minimally support position taken. | Worksheet clearly examines what Christians can learn from other religious traditions. References support position taken. | Worksheet clearly and thoroughly examines what Christians can learn from other religious traditions. References support position taken. | Worksheet clearly and thoroughly examines what Christians can learn from other religious traditions. References are appropriate and skillfully support position taken. |
| Religious Truth Claims | 10.0% | Worksheet does not explain whether religious experiences and teachings in other faiths can be validated as objectively true from a Christian perspective. Worksheet lacks relevant references or examples. | Worksheet unconvincingly explains whether religious experiences and teachings in other faiths can be validated as objectively true from a Christian perspective, using few supportive references or examples. | Worksheet explains whether religious experiences and teachings in other faiths can be validated as objectively true from a Christian perspective, using supportive examples. | Worksheet clearly explains whether religious experiences and teachings in other faiths can be validated as objectively true from a Christian perspective, using pertinent supportive examples. | Worksheet clearly and persuasively explains whether religious experiences and teachings in other faiths can be validated as objectively true from a Christian perspective, using pertinent supportive examples. |
| Encounters With Other Faiths | 20.0% | Worksheet does not explain how Christians can engage with members of other faiths within the framework of the Christian worldview. Content does not demonstrate a respectful perspective. | Worksheet unconvincingly explains how Christians can engage with members of other faiths within the framework of the Christian worldview. Content does not demonstrate a respectful perspective. | Worksheet demonstrates a respectful perspective on how Christians can engage with members of other faiths within the framework of the Christian worldview. | Worksheet clearly demonstrates a respectful perspective on how Christians can engage with members of other faiths within the framework of the Christian worldview. | Worksheet clearly and persuasively demonstrates a respectful perspective on how Christians can engage with members of other faiths within the framework of the Christian worldview. |
| Personal Beliefs | 25.0% | Reflection does not evaluate personal worldview, what shaped that worldview, and how it fits within the framework of Christianity and other religious beliefs. | Reflection unconvincingly evaluates personal worldview, what shaped that worldview, and how it fits within the framework of Christianity and other religious beliefs. | Reflection evaluates personal worldview, what shaped that worldview, and how it fits within the framework of Christianity and other religious beliefs. | Reflection insightfully evaluates personal worldview, what shaped that worldview, and how it fits within the framework of Christianity and other religious beliefs. | Reflection insightfully and honestly evaluates personal worldview, what shaped that worldview, and how it fits within the framework of Christianity and other religious beliefs. |
| Organization and Effectiveness | 11.0% |
| Paragraph Development and Transitions | 6.0% | Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. | Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. | Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationship to each other. | A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. | There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Format | 4.0% |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 4.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
takoda76
Rubric_Print_Format2.xlsx
