| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| ENT-436 | ENT-436-O500 | Benchmark - Design Challenge | 125.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (65.00%) | Satisfactory (75.00%) | Good (85.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Criteria | 100.0% |
| Problem Statement and Impact | 15.0% | Problem and impact are both missing. | Problem is somewhat developed but is missing impact. | Problem is stated, and impact is somewhat developed. | Problem is stated with measurable numbers, and impact is identified. | Problem is clearly stated with measurable numbers, and impact is clearly and thoroughly explained with footnoted evidence. |
| Potential Solutions | 20.0% | Potential solutions are missing. | One potential solution is included. | Two or three potential solutions are named but unclear. | Two potential solutions to the problem are thoroughly explained and testable. | At least three potential solutions to the problem are thoroughly explained and testable. |
| Technological Advances (C2.3) | 15.0% | Technological advances are missing | One to two technological advancements are identified as potential solutions to the problem. Rationales are missing for the proposed technological advancements. | Two technological advancements are identified as potential solutions to the problem and include rationales. | At least three technological advancements are identified as potential solutions to the problem. Rationales are missing for the proposed technological advancements. | At least three technological advancements are identified as potential solutions to the problem and include rationales with footnoted evidence. |
| Initial Constraints | 20.0% | Initial constraints are missing. | Only one initial constraint is listed and explained, given the context of the problem. | At least two initial constraints are listed, given the context of the problem. | At least two initial constraints are listed and thoroughly explained, given the context of the problem. | At least three initial constraints are listed and thoroughly explained, given the context of the problem. |
| Potential Variants (changes in at least one part of the BMC) | 15.0% | Potential variants are missing. | One possible variant is listed and explained. | At least two possible variants are listed and explained. | At least three possible variants are listed. | At least three possible variants are listed and explained. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| per Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
lmiroslaw
Rubric_Print_Format2.xlsx
