| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| LDR-640 | LDR-640-O500 | Innovation Concept Map | 90.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 100.0% |
| Organization and Innovation | 10.0% | Organization and innovation are not included. | Organization or innovation is included. | Organization and innovation are included, but are inaccurate or only partially relevant. | Organization and innovation are included and accurate. | Organization and innovation are comprehensive, accurate, and clear. |
| Innovation Trends | 20.0% | Trends that led to the innovation are not included. | Trends that led to the innovation are incomplete. | Trends that led to the innovation are included, but are inaccurate or only partially relevant. | Trends that led to the innovation are included and accurate. | Trends that led to the innovation are comprehensive, accurate, and clear. |
| Values and Vision | 20.0% | Innovation-related values and vision of the organization are not included. | Innovation-related values of the organization are included, or innovation-related vision of the organization is included, but not both. | Innovation related values and vision of the organization are included, but are only partially relevant. | Innovation related values and vision of the organization are included and relevant. | Innovation related values and vision of the organization are comprehensive, accurate, and clear. |
| Steps and Strategies | 30.0% | Steps and strategies that led to organizational innovative success are not included. | Steps or strategies that led to organizational innovative success are included. | Steps and strategies that led to organizational innovative success are minimally included. | Steps and strategies that led to organizational innovative success are included. | Steps and strategies that led to organizational innovative success are exceptionally included. |
| Concepts | 5.0% | Main concept is not clearly identified, and subconcepts do not consistently branch from the main idea. | Main concept is not clearly identified, and few subconcepts branch appropriately. Limited understanding of assignment is apparent. | Main concept is easily identified, and few subconcepts branch from the main idea. Only a basic understanding of assignment is present. | Main concept is easily identified and most subconcepts branch from the main idea. An original and creative concept fulfills the parameters of assignment. | Main concept is easily identified, and subconcepts branch appropriately from the main idea. Projects exhibit the process of creative thinking and the development of an individual style. |
| Aesthetic Quality | 5.0% | Design is cluttered. Materials detract from the content, or the purpose of presentation is low quality. | Design detracts from purpose. Text and visuals are too simplistic, cluttered, and busy. Little or no creativity or inventiveness is present. | Design is fairly clean, with a few exceptions. Materials add to, not detract from the presentation. Materials used were quality products and easy to see or hear. | Design is appropriate and integrates a variety of objects, charts, and graphs to amplify the message. | Design is clean. Skillful handling of text and visuals creates a distinctive and effective presentation. Overall, effective and functional audio, text, or visuals are evident. |
| Presentation | 5.0% | The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements. | The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements. | The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing. | The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements. | The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
thornleyjaymee
Rubric_Print_Format2.xlsx
