| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| ELM-305 | ELM-305-O501 | Vocabulary Strategies | 30.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (65.00%) | Approaching (75.00%) | Acceptable (85.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Criteria | 100.0% |
| Book and Vocabulary Words | 15.0% | Not addressed. | The book chosen is ineffective or the vocabulary words and their definitions are not grade level appropriate. | The book chosen meets basic student needs and the vocabulary words and definitions are grade level appropriate. | The book chosen is used well and vocabulary words with grade level appropriate definitions are suitable for students. | The book chosen is ideal for the given scenario. The vocabulary words with grade level appropriate definitions reflect best practices for students. |
| Rules of the Game | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Rules provided are unclear and may not adequately describe the roles of both the teacher and students. | Rules provided are broad but include the basic roles of both the teacher and students. | Rules provided are logical and clearly include the roles of both the teacher and students. | Rules provided are comprehensive and specifically include the roles of both the teacher and students. |
| Expanding the Game | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Plan for expanding the game to include higher-order thinking is missing or underdeveloped. | Plan for expanding the game to include higher-order thinking is plausible. | Plan for expanding the game to include higher-order thinking demonstrates detailed consideration. | Plan for expanding the game to include higher-order thinking is creative and expertly designed. |
| Accommodations/ Modifications | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Accommodations or modifications for ELLs and a student with special needs are insufficiently detailed and may be inappropriate for students. | Accommodations or modifications for ELLs and a student with special needs are conventional and minimally detailed but should meet the needs of the identified students. | Accommodations or modifications for ELLs and a student with special needs are proper and reasonable for the student group. | Accommodations or modifications for ELLs and a student with special needs are innovative and demonstrate out-of-the-box thinking. |
| Rationale | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Rationale is incomplete or inadequately describes how the design of the vocabulary game implements research-based strategies to support Jacob’s vocabulary development and foster engagement. Strategy/activity is not aligned to presented research. | Rationale adequately describes how the design of the vocabulary game implements research-based strategies to support Jacob’s vocabulary development and foster engagement. Strategy/activity is basically aligned to presented research. | Rationale makes relevant connections of how the design of the vocabulary game implements research-based strategies to support Jacob’s vocabulary development and foster engagement. Strategy/activity is clearly aligned to presented research. | Rationale insightfully and thoroughly describes how the design of the vocabulary game implements research-based strategies to support Jacob’s vocabulary development and foster engagement. Strategy/activity is professionally aligned to presented research. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. | Submission includes mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech are used, as well as appropriate practice and content-related language. | Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Research Citations | 5.0% | Not addressed. | Reference page includes errors and/or inconsistently used citations. Sources are not credible. | Reference page lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriate and documented, although errors are present. | In-text citations have few errors. References used are reliable and reference page lists all cited sources with few errors. | In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. Sources are credible. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
mdavis_1
Rubric_Print_Format19.xlsx
