| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| ECS-555 | ECS-555-O500 | Nutrition and Fitness Mini-Lessons | 120.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (69.00%) | Approaching (74.00%) | Acceptable (87.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Criteria | 100.0% |
| Standards/Objectives | 5.0% | Not addressed. | The learning targets/objectives not are performance-driven, measurable, or developmentally-appropriate, and may not directly align with the state standard. | The learning targets/objectives are underdeveloped, somewhat measurable, developmentally-appropriate, and minimally aligned with the state standard. | The learning targets/objectives are clearly performance-driven, measurable, developmentally-appropriate, and directly aligned with the state standard. | The learning targets/objectives are expertly written, performance-driven, measurable, developmentally-appropriate, and specifically aligned with the state standard. |
| Summary and Focus | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Summary of the lesson is minimal, and the central focus of the lesson is unclear. | Summary of the lesson is adequate, and the central focus based on content and skills being taught is given basic consideration. | Summary of the lesson is detailed, and the central focus based on content and skills being taught is relevant. | The lesson is thoroughly summarized, and the central focus based on content and skills being taught is expertly identified. |
| Student Factors | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Description of the important classroom/student factors based on the class profile is irrelevant. | Description of the important classroom/student factors based on the class profile is sufficient. | Description of the important classroom/student factors based on the class profile is logical. | A comprehensive description of the important classroom/student factors based on the class profile is included. |
| Academic Language | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Academic language is missing several key terms, or terms presented are not relevant. Teaching strategies are inappropriate or underdeveloped. | Academic language is sufficient, although missing some key terms, or includes a term that is irrelevant. Includes adequate strategies for teaching the new terms. | Appropriate academic terms are listed along with clear and relevant strategies for teaching the new terms. | An ideal list of academic terms are included along with innovative and engaging strategies for teaching the new terms. |
| Resources/Materials | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Resources, materials, equipment, and technology are inappropriate for the lesson. | Resources, materials, equipment, and technology are adequate for the lesson. | Resources, materials, equipment, and technology are appropriate for the lesson. | Resources, materials, equipment, and technology are innovative and enhance the lesson. |
| Community Organizations | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Community organizations selected are inappropriate and summary on why each organization should be featured in the Wellness Fair is unclear. | Community organizations selected are adequate and a simple summary on why each organization should be featured in the Wellness Fair is included. | Community organizations are logically selected and a meaningful summary on why each organization should be featured in the Wellness Fair is included. | Community organizations are thoughtfully selected and an insightful summary on why each organization should be featured in the Wellness Fair is included. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking. | Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Appropriate template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
rnixon@123
Rubric_Print_Format18.xlsx
