| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| ELM-550 | ELM-550-O501 | Questioning Strategies | 75.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (69.00%) | Approaching (74.00%) | Acceptable (87.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 100.0% |
| Social Studies and Arts Standard and Learning Objective | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Template is missing one of the social studies or arts standards; the learning objective is poorly or inadequately aligned to the standards. | Template includes social studies and arts standards and learning objective that marginally align to the standards. | Template includes both a social studies and arts standards and developed learning objective that align to the standards. | Template includes both social studies and arts standards and clearly developed learning objective that purposefully align to the standards. |
| Probing Questions | 30.0% | Not addressed. | Template provides inadequate or incomplete examples of questions that connect concepts in social studies and the arts, procedures and applications from social studies and the arts, activate prior knowledge for the lesson, or encourage exploration problem-solving. | Template includes basic examples of probing questions that connect concepts in social studies and the arts, procedures and applications from social studies and the arts, activate prior knowledge for the lesson, or encourage exploration problem-solving. Examples lack specific details or relevance. | Template includes well defined examples of probing questions that connect concepts in social studies and the arts, procedures and applications from social studies and the arts, activate prior knowledge for the lesson, and encourage exploration problem-solving. Examples are clear and thorough. | Template includes insightful examples of probing questions that connect concepts in social studies and the arts, procedures and applications from social studies and the arts, activate prior knowledge for the lesson, and encourage exploration problem-solving. Examples are clear, thorough, and highly relevant. |
| Reflection and Application to Professional Practice | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Reflection is lacking an explanation of using questioning as a strategy in the content area of social studies and various forms of the arts and how these questions inadequately meet the diverse needs of students. Applications to future practice are weak and do not reflect growth and development as a professional. | Reflection is limited in explaining the use of questioning as a strategy in the content area of social studies and various forms of the arts and how these questions adequately meet the diverse needs of students. Applications to future practice are rudimentary level and minimally reflect growth and development as a professional. | Reflection includes a clear explanation of the use of questioning as a strategy in the content area of social studies and various forms of the arts and how these questions appropriately meet the diverse needs of students. Applications to practice are solid and reflect growth and development as a professional. | Reflection demonstrates well-researched and developed explanation of the use of questioning as a strategy in the content area of social studies and various forms of the arts and how these questions successfully meet the diverse needs of students. Applications to future practice are insightful and clearly reflect growth and development as a professional. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 25.0% | Not addressed. | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking. | Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Varieties of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Not addressed. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
NJK11
Rubric_Print_Format17.xlsx
