Reflection: GCU Code of Conduct

profilernixon@123
Rubric_Print_Format16.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
UNV-103 UNV-103-O101 Reflection: GCU Code of Conduct 65.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (65.00%) Satisfactory (75.00%) Good (85.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 80.0%
In your own words, explain two academic integrity violations and two code of conduct violations. Give a specific example of what the four identified violations could be. 20.0% No response to the prompt is given. The response to the prompt is not clear. There is a seemingly random collection of information. The response to the prompt is acceptable, but it could use more supporting information. The response to the prompt is clear and the supporting information digs deeper into what the prompt is asking. The response to the prompt comprehensively answers questions in the prompt. Response is thorough and insightful with relevant and specific evidence to support claims.
Define plagiarism in your own words. 20.0% No response to the prompt is given. The response is not clear. There is a seemingly random collection of information. The response is somewhat clear, but there is a need for more supporting information. The response is clear, but the supporting information is general or missing. The response is addressed with a well-focused topic. Main idea stands out and is supported by detailed information.
Why do you think students plagiarize? 20.0% No response to the prompt is given. The response is not clear. There is a seemingly random collection of information. The response is somewhat clear, but there is a need for more supporting information. The response is clear, but the supporting information is general or missing. The response is addressed with a well-focused topic. Main idea stands out and is supported by detailed information.
Describe how students can avoid academic dishonesty, in group work or as an individual? 20.0% No response to the prompt is given. The response is not clear. There is a seemingly random collection of information. The response is somewhat clear, but there is a need for more supporting information. The response is clear, but the supporting information is general or missing. The response is addressed with a well-focused topic. Main idea stands out and is supported by detailed information.
Organization and Effectiveness 15.0%
Paragraph Development and Organization 5.0% Sentences and paragraphs are disjointed and consistently lack unity and coherence. Purpose and theme of the paper is not clear. Organization lacks continuity. Some sentences and paragraphs may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. There seems to be a measure of theme and purpose to the paper. Some degree of organization is evident. Sentences and paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in purpose, organization and/or in their relationships to each other. A logical progression of ideas, theme and purpose within each sentence or paragraph is apparent. Sentences and Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. There is a sophisticated construction of sentences and paragraphs to serve a clear theme and purpose. Ideas progress and relate to each other coherently. Sentence and paragraph structure is seamless and cohesive.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 10.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format 5.0%
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% GCU template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. GCU template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. GCU template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. GCU template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct including: GCU style formatting, student header, centered title, Times New Roman, 12 point font and double spaced. The text is left aligned and the first lines of the paragraphs are indented at 0.5.
Total Weightage 100%