| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| SOC-400 | SOC-400-O500 | Content Analysis Worksheet | 70.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) | Satisfactory (75.00%) | Good (85.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Criteria | 100.0% |
| Explanation about how quantitative analysis could be involved in the student’s study of media and literature. Two sources cited. | 20.0% | Explanation about how quantitative analysis could be involved in the student’s study of media and literature is not included. | Explanation about how quantitative analysis could be involved in the student’s study of media and literature is vague and incomplete. Two sources are not cited. | Explanation about how quantitative analysis could be involved in the student’s study of media and literature is adequate but lacks some details. Two somewhat appropriate sources are cited, but there are some APA errors. | Explanation about how quantitative analysis could be involved in the student’s study of media and literature is thorough and detailed. Two relevant sources are accurately cited. | Explanation about how quantitative analysis could be involved in the student’s study of media and literature is comprehensive and exceptionally detailed. Two relevant sources are expertly cited. |
| Explanation about quantitative analysis would likely reflect an interpretivist or positivist methodology. Two sources cited. | 20.0% | Explanation about whether quantitative analysis would likely reflect an interpretivist or positivist methodology is not included. | Explanation about whether quantitative analysis would likely reflect an interpretivist or positivist methodology is vague and incomplete. Two sources are not cited. | Explanation about whether quantitative analysis would likely reflect an interpretivist or positivist methodology is adequate but lacks some details. Two somewhat appropriate sources are cited, but there are some APA errors. | Explanation about whether quantitative analysis would likely reflect an interpretivist or positivist methodology is thorough and detailed. Two relevant sources are accurately cited. | Explanation about whether quantitative analysis would likely reflect an interpretivist or positivist methodology is comprehensive and accurately detailed. Two relevant sources are expertly cited. |
| Explanation about the student approach to this topic as qualitative analysis
Two sources cited.
| 25.0% | Explanation about how the student would approach this topic as qualitative analysis approach to the study of media and literature is not included. | Explanation about how the student would approach this topic as qualitative analysis approach to the study of media and literature is vague and incomplete. Two sources are not cited. | Explanation about how the student would approach this topic as qualitative analysis approach to the study of media and literature is adequate but lacks some details. Two decent sources are cited, but there are some APA errors. | Explanation about how the student would approach this topic as qualitative analysis approach to the study of media and literature is thorough and detailed. Two relevant sources are accurately cited. | Explanation about how the student would approach this topic as qualitative analysis approach to the study of media and literature is comprehensive and accurately detailed. Two relevant sources are expertly cited. |
| Explanation about how a qualitative analysis approach would reflect an interpretivist or positivist methodology. Two sources cited.
| 15.0% | Explanation about whether a qualitative analysis approach would reflect an interpretivist or positivist methodology is not included. | Explanation about whether a qualitative analysis approach would reflect an interpretivist or positivist methodology is vague and incomplete. Two sources are not cited. | Explanation about whether a qualitative analysis approach would reflect an interpretivist or positivist methodology is adequate but lacks some details. Two somewhat appropriate sources are cited, but there are some APA errors. | Explanation about whether a qualitative analysis approach would reflect an interpretivist or positivist methodology is thorough and detailed. Two relevant sources are accurately cited | Explanation about whether a qualitative analysis approach would reflect an interpretivist or positivist methodology is comprehensive and exceptionally detailed. Two relevant sources are expertly cited. |
| Research question that could be studied through content analysis.
| 10.0% | Research question is not included. | Research question is vague and incomplete. Could not be studied through content analysis as is. | Research question is somewhat adequate. Could be studied through content analysis. | Research question is accurate and could be studied through content analysis. | Research question is expertly accurate and could be competently studied through content analysis. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Mommia
Rubric_Print_Format14.xlsx
