| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| ELM-305 | ELM-305-O501 | Clinical Field Experience B: Student Needs and Instructional Planning | 35.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (65.00%) | Approaching (75.00%) | Acceptable (85.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Criteria | 100.0% |
| Observations | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Summary insufficiently reflects upon the observations of the identified small group. | Summary sufficiently reflects upon the observations of the identified small group. | Summary effectively reflects upon the observations of the identified small group. | Summary skillfully reflects upon the observations of the identified small group. |
| Examples of Student Literacy Needs | 25.0% | Not addressed. | Examples are missing or weakly identify specific student literacy needs. | Examples attempt to identify specific student literacy needs but could be detailed. | Examples appropriately identify specific student literacy needs. | Examples expertly identify specific student literacy needs. |
| Literacy Lesson Plan Ideas | 25.0% | Not addressed. | Lesson plan ideas are vague and do not demonstrate best practices for reading comprehension, vocabulary, and writing activities. | Lesson plan ideas are basic and meet basic student needs for reading comprehension, vocabulary, and writing activities. | Lesson plan ideas are used well and provide clear support for reading comprehension, vocabulary, and writing activities. | Lesson plan ideas are quality and demonstrate best practices for reading comprehension, vocabulary, and writing activities. |
| Conclusions and Applications to Future Practice | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Responses on applying conclusions to practice are not related to assignment or not submitted. | Conclusions and applications to future practice are lacking in detail, but are appropriate for the elementary setting. | Conclusions and applications to future practice are thoughtful, realistic for the classroom setting, and reflect professional growth. | Conclusions and applications to future practice are insightful, demonstrate a keen awareness of the needs of the students, and clearly reflect growth and development as a professional. |
| Organization | 5.0% | Not addressed. | An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other. | The content is adequately organized, generally providing the audience with a sense of the main idea. | The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. | The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. | Submission includes mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech are used, as well as appropriate practice and content-related language. | Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
mdavis_1
Rubric_Print_Format14.xlsx
