| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| ELM-570 | ELM-570-O500 | Clinical Field Experience B: Pre-Assessment | 25.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (69.00%) | Approaching (74.00%) | Acceptable (87.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 100.0% |
| Pre-Assessment | 30.0% | Not addressed. | Pre-assessment is incomplete and poorly developed in the science content area, with weak alignment to standards. Pre-assessment does not determine learning gaps and needs of students. | Pre-assessment includes all elements, but is under developed in the science content area, somewhat aligned to appropriate standards. Pre-assessment vaguely determines learning gaps and needs of students. | Pre-assessment is adequately developed in the science content area, aligned to appropriate standards, in order to determine learning gaps and needs of students. | Pre-assessment is expertly and thoughtfully developed in the science content area, proficiently aligned to appropriate standards, in order to determine learning gaps and needs of students. |
| Reflection | 30.0% | Not addressed. | Summary and reflection includes a poor and inadequate description of the process of identifying students and data to determine learning gaps and needs of students, with a unrelated description of the challenges in developing and delivering the pre-assessment. | Summary and reflection includes an overly simplistic description of the process of identifying students and data to determine learning gaps and needs of students, with a marginal description of the challenges in developing and delivering the pre-assessment. | Summary and reflection include a sufficient description of the process of identifying students in order to provide data to determine learning gaps and needs of students, with a description of the challenges in developing and delivering the pre-assessment. | Summary and reflection include a thorough and comprehensive description of the process of identifying students in order to provide data to determine learning gaps and needs of students, with a full description of the ethical use of data and challenges in developing and delivering the pre-assessment. |
| Future Implications | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Conclusions and applications to future practice are inappropriate or not related to assignment. | Conclusions and applications to future practice are lacking in detail of development as a professional. | Conclusions and applications to future practice are thoughtful and reflect growth and development as a professional. | Conclusions and applications to future practice are insightful and clearly reflect growth and development as a professional. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 30.0% | Not addressed. | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking. | Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Royce0615
Rubric_Print_Format14.xlsx
