| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| ITT-455 | ITT-455-O500 | Risk Management Plan | 125.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (65.00%) | Satisfactory (75.00%) | Good (85.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 100.0% |
| Risk Analysis | 15.0% | Risk analysis is not provided. | Risk analysis is provided but not the acceptable level of risk for the project. | Risk analysis is provided with the acceptable level of risk for the project but needs explanation. | Risk analysis is provided with the acceptable level of risk for the project. It provides rudimentary explanation and rationale. | Risk analysis is provided with the acceptable level of risk for the project. It provides detailed explanation and supportive rationale. |
| Risk Identification | 15.0% | Risk identification is not provided. | Risk identification is provided but not completed. | Risk identification is provided without missing requirements. | Risk identification is provided with rudimentary explanation. | Risk identification is provided with detailed explanation. |
| Probability of Risk | 15.0% | Probability of risk is not provided. | Probability of risk is provided but missing the matrix. | Probability of risk is provided with the matrix but no rationale is provided. | Probability of risk is provided with the matrix. It provides acceptable rationale. | Probability of risk is provided with the matrix. It provides detailed and elaborated rationale. |
| Risk Response Planning | 30.0% | Risk response planning is not provided. | Risk response planning is provided but no strategies provided to resolve various issues. | Risk response planning is provided with strategies to resolve various issues but not feasible. | Risk response planning is provided with acceptable strategies to resolve various issues. | Risk response planning is provided with strong strategies to resolve various issues including conflict management, resource challenges, and change management. It shows feasibility through detailed explanation |
| Technical Understanding of Risks | 12.0% | No technical considerations are identified within the plan. | Few technical risks are identified within the plan. | Technical risks identified within the plan but do not directly correlate to the project. | Technical risks identified and correlate to the project but are not accurately discussed in the plan. | Technical risk discussed in-depth, with a high-level of understanding on how they affect the project. |
| Paragraph Development and Transitions | 5.0% | Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. | Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. | Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. | A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. | There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 1.0% | APA is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | APA is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. | APA is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | APA is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. Free of any and all formatting errors. |
| Documentation of Sources (In-text citations for paraphrasing/direct quotes/images/etc. and reference page/bibliography as appropriate to assignment and style) | 2.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
biolablaq
Rubric_Print_Format13.xlsx
