Rubric_Print_Format13.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
ESL-533 ESL-533-O501 Proficiency Level Analysis 75.0
Criteria Percentage No Submission (0.00%) Insufficient (69.00%) Approaching (74.00%) Acceptable (87.00%) Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Category 100.0%
Grouping for In-class English Language Arts Activities 40.0% Not addressed. The description of the grouping strategy for the students on the class list is not presented clearly or the grouping strategy is inadequate for in-class English language arts activities. The description of the grouping strategy for the students on the class list could be presented more clearly or the grouping strategy could be more adequate for in-class English language arts activities. Includes a description of a grouping strategy for the students on the class list that would be adequate for in-class English language arts activities. Includes a well-informed description of a grouping strategy for the students on the class list that would be ideally suited for in-class English language arts activities.
Rationale 40.0% Not addressed. The rationale regarding the grouping strategy for the in-class activities is not presented well. The rationale regarding the grouping strategy for the in-class activities could be more fully developed. Includes rationale regarding the grouping strategy for the in-class activities. Includes an insightful rationale regarding the grouping strategy for the in-class activities.
Organization 5.0% Not addressed. An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other. The content could be organized better even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea. The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.
APA Format and Style Requirements 5.0% Not addressed. References page is present, but citations are inconsistently used. References page is included. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. References page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a references page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of errors.
Mechanics (spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 10.0% Not addressed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present but are not overly distracting to the reader; or inconsistent language or word choice is present; or sentence structure could be more varied. Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
Total Weightage 100%