| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| ITT-455 | ITT-455-O500 | Risks, Assumptions, Issues, and Dependencies | 75.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (65.00%) | Satisfactory (75.00%) | Good (85.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 100.0% |
| RAID Creation | 36.0% | No RAID items are identified. | RAID items are identified but are not technical in nature. | RAID items identified are technical in nature but do not correlate with the project. | RAID items identified are technical in nature and correlate with the project. | RAID items identified are technical in nature, correlate with the project, and are identified as internal or external to the project. |
| Resource Plan | 36.0% | No resource place is identified. | Resource plan identified does not align with the project vision, outline, and RAID log. | Resource plan identified aligns loosely with the project vision, outline, and RAID log, but many items let unaddressed. | Resource plan identified directly aligns with the project and RAID log, and no items are left unaddressed. | Resource plan identified directly aligns with the project and RAID log, and no items are left unaddressed. Contingency plan is included in total resource allocation. |
| Research | 10.0% | No outside sources are used to support the assignment. | Few outside sources are used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent. | Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness. | Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. | Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Research addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. |
| Technical Skill | 10.0% | No technical skills are addressed or identified. | Technical skills are considered in resource plan but lack all needed parties to complete the project. | Technical skills and risks are presented, but no mitigation demonstrated in RAID log or the resource plan. | All technical skills needed to be identified are addressed throughout RAID log and resource plan. | Technical skills and risks are defined. All dependencies are marked as successors or predecessors within the RAID log. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Paper Format / Academic Writing | 1.0% | Writing is not academic. Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. | Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. | Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. | A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. | Solid academic writing is demonstrated. There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless. |
| Documentation of Sources (in-text citations for paraphrasing/direct quotes/images/etc. and reference page/bibliography as appropriate to assignment and style) | 2.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
biolablaq
Rubric_Print_Format11.xlsx
