week 3 assignment 400

profileMommia
Rubric_Print_Format11.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
SOC-400 SOC-400-O500 Survey Analysis Worksheet 70.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) Satisfactory (75.00%) Good (85.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Criteria 100.0%
Explanation about the drawbacks of a mail survey. The text and one other source about mail surveys are cited. 15.0% Explanation about the drawbacks of a mail survey is not included. Explanation about the drawbacks of a mail survey is vague and incomplete. The text and one other source about mail surveys are not cited. Explanation about the drawbacks of a mail survey is adequate but lacks some details. The text and one other source about mail surveys are cited. Explanation about the drawbacks of a mail survey is thorough and detailed. The text and one other source about mail surveys are properly cited. Explanation about the drawbacks of a mail survey is comprehensive and concisely detailed. The text and one other source about mail surveys are exceptionally cited
Explanation about the type of survey and mode of delivery of the survey. The text and one other source about mail surveys are cited. 15.0% Explanation about the type of survey and mode of delivery of the survey is not included. Explanation about which type of survey mode of delivery is recommended is vague and incomplete. The text and one other source about mail surveys are not cited. Explanation about which type of survey mode of delivery is recommended is adequate but lacks some details. The text and one other source about mail surveys are cited. Explanation about which type of survey mode of delivery is recommended is thoroughly detailed. The text and one other source about mail surveys are properly cited. Explanation about which type of survey mode of delivery is recommended is comprehensive and concisely detailed. The text and one other source about mail surveys are accurately cited.
Explanation about what type of methodology this survey is based on. The text and one other source about this kind of survey are cited. 15.0% Explanation about what type of methodology this survey is not included. Explanation about what type of methodology this survey is vague and incomplete. The text and one other source about this kind of survey are not cited. Explanation about what type of methodology this survey is based on is adequate but lacks some details. The text and one other source about this kind of survey are cited. Explanation about what type of methodology this survey is based on is thorough and detailed. The text and one other source about this kind of survey are properly cited. Explanation about what type of methodology this survey is based on is comprehensive and concisely detailed. The text and one other source about this kind of survey are accurately cited.
Sample question suitable for the mode of survey delivery. 10.0% Sample question suitable for the mode of survey delivery is not included. Sample question suitable for the mode of survey delivery is vague and incomplete. Makes no sense. Sample question suitable for the mode of survey delivery is adequate but needs some work. Doesn’t connect well to the survey. Sample question suitable for the mode of survey delivery is thorough and relevant to the survey. Sample question suitable for the mode of survey delivery is accurate and expertly connected to the survey.
Explanation about how a representative sample of families would be obtained and why. 15.0% Explanation about how a representative sample of families would be obtained and why is not included. Explanation about how a representative sample of families would be obtained and why is vague and incomplete. Lacks important details. Explanation about how a representative sample of families would be obtained and why is adequate but lacks some details. Explanation about how a representative sample of families would be obtained and why is through and detailed. Explanation about how a representative sample of families would be obtained and why is comprehensive and concisely detailed.
Explanation of what size sample would be adequate if there are 300 different families who have children attending the school. 10.0% Explanation of what size sample would be adequate if there are 300 different families who have children attending the school is not included. Explanation of what size sample would be adequate if there are 300 different families who have children attending the school is vague and incomplete. Lacks important details. Explanation of what size sample would be adequate if there are 300 different families who have children attending the school is adequate but lacks some details. Explanation of what size sample would be adequate if there are 300 different families who have children attending the school is thoroughly detailed. Explanation of what size sample would be adequate if there are 300 different families who have children attending the school is comprehensive and accurately detailed.
Explanation about the ethical issues anticipated in this survey, and how they will be addressed. 10.0% Explanation about the ethical issues anticipated in this survey, and how they will be addressed is not included. Explanation about the ethical issues anticipated in this survey, and how they will be addressed is vague and incomplete. Lacks important details. Explanation about the ethical issues anticipated in this survey, and how they will be addressed is adequate but lacks some details. Explanation about the ethical issues anticipated in this survey, and how they will be addressed is thoroughly detailed. Explanation about the ethical issues anticipated in this survey, and how they will be addressed is comprehensive and accurately detailed.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%