| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| ELM-570 | ELM-570-O500 | Science Unit Plan: Materials, Resources, and the Integration of Technology | 70.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (69.00%) | Approaching (74.00%) | Acceptable (87.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 100.0% |
| Materials, Resources, and Technology: Support Students | 25.0% | Not addressed. | Materials, resources, and technology inadequately and poorly support students in chosen content, development of relevant skills, and lack opportunities for student engagement. | Science Unit Plan includes beginning level examples of materials, resources, and technology that minimally support students in chosen content, development of relevant skills, and vaguely encourage student engagement. | Science Unit Plan includes relevant examples of materials, resources, and technology that appropriately support students in chosen content, development of relevant skills, and encourage student engagement. | Science Unit Plan includes well-researched examples of materials, resources, and technology that proficiently support students in chosen content, development of relevant skills, and specifically encourage student engagement. |
| Materials, Resources, and Technology: Appropriate and Relevant | 25.0% | Not addressed. | Science Unit Plan is unfocused, with poor and irrelevant examples of digital tools, resources, and technology that inadequately support diverse student needs and learning advancement. | Science Unit Plan includes vague and overly simplistic examples of digital tools, resources, and technology that marginally support diverse student needs and learning advancement. | Science Unit Plan includes detailed and logical examples of appropriate and relevant digital tools, resources, and technology that adequately support diverse student needs and learning advancement. | Science Unit Plan includes skillful and well researched examples of extensive and creative digital tools, resources, and technology that thoughtfully support diverse student needs and learning advancement. |
| Reflection | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Reflection is incoherent in describing the planning process, how to utilize informational resources to engage students, and develop confidence. A poor and unrelated explanation is included as to how to evaluate curriculum materials, resources, and student data when choosing materials. | Reflection vaguely describes planning process, how to utilize informational resources to engage students, and develop confidence. An overly simplistic explanation is included as to how to evaluate curriculum materials, resources, and student data when choosing materials. | Reflection clearly and directly describes planning process, how to utilize informational resources to appropriately engage students and develop confidence, and a detailed explanation of how to evaluate curriculum materials, resources, and student data when choosing materials. | Reflection insightfully and thoroughly describes planning process, how to utilize informational resources to skillfully engage students and develop confidence, and an insightful explanation of how to evaluate curriculum materials, resources, and student data when choosing materials. |
| Research Citations | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Many citations are missing where needed; or many of the sources are inappropriate for the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but many aspects are missing or mistaken. | Some citations may be missing where needed; or some of the sources do not support the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but some aspects are missing or mistaken. | All sources are credible, adequate, and support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission. | All sources are credible, appropriate, and strongly support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking. | Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Varieties of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Royce0615
Rubric_Print_Format10.xlsx
