| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| HLT-313V | HLT-313V-O500 | Managing Quality Assurance in the Workplace Essay | 175.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) | Satisfactory (75.00%) | Good (85.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 70.0% |
| Allied Health Care Sector Growth Management | 15.0% | Essay does not include a discussion of growth management in the allied health care sector. | Essay includes a discussion of growth management in the allied health care sector, but elements are missing or the submission is otherwise incomplete. | Essay includes a basic discussion of growth management in the allied health care sector. Minimal detail and/or support are provided. | Essay includes a complete discussion of growth management in the allied health care sector. Essay incorporates most essential details and provides appropriate support. | Essay includes a clear and thorough discussion of growth management in the allied health care sector. Essay analyzes supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. |
| Safety, Risk Management Factors, and Quality Management Tools | 10.0% | Essay does not include an analysis of the core safety, risk management factors, and quality management tools in the health care industry through accreditation that assist in the decision-making process for implementation. | Essay an analysis of the core safety, risk management factors, and quality management tools in the health care industry through accreditation that assist in the decision-making process for implementation, but elements are missing or the submission is otherwise incomplete. | Essay includes an analysis of the core safety, risk management factors, and quality management tools in the health care industry through accreditation that assist in the decision-making process for implementation. Minimal detail and/or support are provided. | Essay includes a complete analysis of the core safety, risk management factors, and quality management tools in the health care industry through accreditation that assist in the decision-making process for implementation. Essay incorporates most essential details and provides appropriate support. | Essay includes a clear and thorough analysis of the core safety, risk management factors, and quality management tools in the health care industry through accreditation that assist in the decision-making process for implementation. Essay analyzes supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. |
| Decision Making Process in Allied Health Care | 15.0% | Essay does not include a discussion of the decision-making process for safety, risk management, and quality management in allied health care. | Essay includes a discussion of the decision-making process for safety, risk management, and quality management in allied health care but elements are missing or the discussion is vague. | Essay includes a discussion of the decision-making process for safety, risk management, and quality management in allied health care but there is minimal detail. | Essay includes a complete discussion of the decision-making process for safety, risk management, and quality management in allied health care and there is appropriate amount of detail. | Essay includes a thorough discussion of the decision-making process for safety, risk management, and quality management in allied health care with ample detail. |
| Steps Taken by the US to Maintain High Standards | 10.0% | Essay does not include a discussion of the possible steps taken by the United States to maintain high standards to provide outstanding care-based services. | Essay includes an incomplete discussion of the possible steps taken by the United States to maintain high standards to provide outstanding care-based services with limited amount of detail. | Essay includes brief discussion of the possible steps taken by the United States to maintain high standards to provide outstanding care-based services with minimal detail. | Essay includes a complete discussion of the possible steps taken by the United States to maintain high standards to provide outstanding care-based services with adequate detail. | Essay includes a complete and thorough discussion of the possible steps taken by the United States to maintain high standards to provide outstanding care-based services with appropriate detail. |
| Core Safety, Risk Management, and Quality Management Tools | 10.0% | Description of the core safety, risk management, and quality management tools in the health care industry is not present. | Description of the core safety, risk management, and quality management tools in the health care industry is present but is incomplete. | Description of the core safety, risk management, and quality management tools in the health care industry is present but lacks detail. | Description of the core safety, risk management, and quality management tools in the health care industry is adequate and complete. | Description of the core safety, risk management, and quality management tools in the health care industry is comprehensive. |
| Two or More Performance-Based Trends | 10.0% | Identification of two or more performance-based trends in patient safety, risk management, and quality management in health care organizations is not present. | Identification of two or more performance-based trends in patient safety, risk management, and quality management in health care organizations is present but is incomplete. | Identification of two or more performance-based trends in patient safety, risk management, and quality management in health care organizations is present but lacks detail. | Identification of two or more performance-based trends in patient safety, risk management, and quality management in health care organizations is adequate and complete. | Identification of two or more performance-based trends in patient safety, risk management, and quality management in health care organizations is comprehensive. |
| Organization and Effectiveness | 20.0% |
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Format | 10.0% |
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Appropriate template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
FBooker
Rubric_Print_Format1.xlsx
