| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| SEC-516 | SEC-516-O500 | Data-Based Instruction and Assessment | 70.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (69.00%) | Approaching (74.00%) | Acceptable (87.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Criteria | 100.0% |
| Supplemental Reading/Writing Resources and Rationale (including standards and noted patterns and gaps in learning) | 15.0% | Not addressed. | The resources are irrelevant and/or rationales are poorly developed. | The resources are inconsistent or rationales are vague and could be more thorough. | The resources are relevant and rationales are detailed. | The resources are insightful and rationales are creative and comprehensive. |
| Lesson Topic Ideas with Rationales | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Lesson topic ideas are inadequate and/or rationales are ineffectively developed. | Lesson topic ideas are weak or rationales are unclear. | Lesson topic ideas are logical and rationales are descriptive. | Lesson topic ideas are specific and rationales are expertly developed. |
| Assessment Ideas | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Assessment ideas ineffectively monitor student progress in attaining the content. | Assessment ideas insufficiently monitor student progress in attaining the content. | Assessment ideas effectively monitor student progress in attaining the content. | Assessment ideas proficiently monitor student progress in attaining the content. |
| Summary of Feedback for Students | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Summary of feedback for students is inadequately developed or incomplete and/or does not address all requirements. | Summary of feedback for students is unfocused or vague or does not address all requirements. | Summary of feedback for students is logical and complete. | Summary of feedback for students is creative and thorough. |
| Explanation of Collaboration with Colleagues | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Explanation of collaboration with colleagues is unconvincing and/or does not address all requirements. | Explanation of collaboration with colleagues is unclear or does not address all requirements. | Explanation of collaboration with colleagues is descriptive and completely addresses all requirements. | Explanation of collaboration with colleagues is innovative and skillfully addresses all requirements. |
| Organization | 10.0% | Not addressed. | An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized; may not relate to each other. | The content may not be adequately organized even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea. | The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. | The content is well organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas related to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit. Provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. |
| Research Citations and Format | 5.0% | Not addressed. | Many citations are missing where needed; or many of the sources are inappropriate for the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but many aspects are missing or mistaken. | Some citations may be missing where needed; or some of the sources do not support the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but some aspects are missing or mistaken. | All sources are credible, adequate, and support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission. | All sources are credible, appropriate, and strongly support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking. | Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Varieties of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
KitaG
Rubric_Print_Format1.xlsx
