| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| SPD-501 | SPD-501-O101 | Technology in Education Presentation | 75.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (69.00%) | Approaching (74.00%) | Acceptable (87.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Group 1 | 100.0% |
| Technology that Improves Student Learning | 30.0% | Not addressed. | Includes examples of technologies inadequately suited to improve student learning within a special educational environment. | Includes examples of technologies that could be more adequately suited to improve student learning within a special educational environment. | Includes examples of technologies appropriately suited to improve student learning within a special educational environment. | Includes examples of technologies ideally suited to improve student learning within a special educational environment. |
| Technology for Collaborative Use | 30.0% | Not addressed. | Includes examples of technologies inadequately suited for collaborative use within a special educational environment. | Includes examples of technologies that could be more adequately suited for collaborative use within a special educational environment. | Includes examples of technologies appropriately suited for collaborative use within a special educational environment. | Includes examples of technologies ideally suited for collaborative use within a special educational environment. |
| Considerations Regarding Access | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Includes considerations that inadequately address student access to or use of technology for learning. | Includes considerations that could more adequately address student access to or use of technology for learning. | Includes considerations regarding student access to and use of technology for learning. | Includes comprehensive considerations regarding student access to and use of technology for learning. |
| Visual Appeal | 5.0% | Not addressed. | There are few or no graphic elements. No variation in layout or typography is evident. | Minimal use of graphic elements is evident. Some elements may not contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. There is some variation in type size, color, and layout. | Thematic graphic elements are used, but not always in context. Visual connections mostly contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size or color are used well and consistently. | Appropriate and thematic graphic elements are used to make visual connections that contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size and color are used well and consistently. |
| Organization | 5.0% | Not addressed. | An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized; may not relate to each other. | The content could be organized better even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea. | The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. | The content is well organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. |
| Research Citations and Format | 5.0% | Not addressed. | Many citations are missing where needed; or many of the sources are inappropriate for the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but many aspects are missing or mistaken. | Some citations may be missing or do not completely support the submission. References page may include errors. Some sources may not be appropriate for the submission. | All sources are credible, adequate, and support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission. | All sources are credible, appropriate, and strongly support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission. |
| Mechanics (spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | 5.0% | Not addressed. | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present but are not overly distracting to the reader; or inconsistent language or word choice is present; or sentence structure could be more varied. | Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Varieties of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |