Curriculum Models in Nursing Education

profileElampal
Rubric_Print_Format1.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
NUR-648E NUR-648E-O500 Curriculum Models in Nursing Education 80.0
Criteria Percentage 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) 2: Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%) 3: Satisfactory (88.00%) 4: Good (92.00%) 5: Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Criteria 100.0%
Three Curriculum Design Models 10.0% A description of three curriculum design models is not present. A description of three curriculum design models is present but lacks detail or is incomplete. A description of three curriculum design models is present. A description of three curriculum design models is well developed. A description of three curriculum design models is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Level of Nursing Education 10.0% The level of nursing education appropriate for each model is not present. The level of nursing education appropriate for each model is present but is inaccurately identified. NA NA The level of nursing education appropriate for each model is correctly identified.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Each Model for the Learner 10.0% Advantages and disadvantages of each model for the learner are not present. Advantages and disadvantages of each model for the learner are present but lack detail or are incomplete. Advantages and disadvantages of each model for the learner are present. Advantages and disadvantages of each model for the learner are well developed. Advantages and disadvantages of each model for the learner are thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Each Model for the Educator 10.0% Advantages and disadvantages of each model for the educator are not present. Advantages and disadvantages of each model for the educator are present but lack detail or are incomplete. Advantages and disadvantages of each model for the educator are present. Advantages and disadvantages of each model for the educator are well developed. Advantages and disadvantages of each model for the educator are thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Presentation of Content 20.0% The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information. The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other. The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources. The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
Layout 15.0% The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
Speaker notes 5.0% Speaker notes are not present. Speaker notes are present but lack detail or are incomplete. Speaker notes are present. Speaker notes are present and well developed. Speaker notes are thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 10.0% Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 10.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%