| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| ELM-200 | ELM-200-O501 | Contextual Influences on Learning Presentation | 90.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (65.00%) | Approaching (75.00%) | Acceptable (85.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Criteria | 100.0% |
| Social Interactions, culture, Society, and Technology | 20.0% | Not addressed. | The description of how social interactions, culture, society, and technology can effect student development and readiness for learning is incomplete or irrelevant. | The description of how social interactions, culture, society, and technology can effect student development and readiness for learning is basic. | A clear and logical description of how social interactions, culture, society, and technology can effect student development and readiness for learning is provided. | A comprehensive and in-depth description of how social interactions, culture, society, and technology can effect student development and readiness for learning is provided. |
| Classroom Instruction | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Description of how the contextual factors could be addressed in classroom instruction is insufficient or incomplete. | Description of how the contextual factors could be addressed in classroom instruction are basic. | Description of how the contextual factors could be addressed in classroom instruction is clear. | Description of how the contextual factors could be addressed in classroom instruction is comprehensive. |
| Examples of Modification | 20.0% | Not addressed | Examples of modifications to address contextual factors are undeveloped or illogical. | Examples of modifications to address contextual factors are rudimentary. | Examples of modifications to address contextual factors are detailed and relevant. | Examples of modifications to address contextual factors are creative and realistic. |
| Layout | 10.0% | Not addressed. | The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. | The layout uses white space adequately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or background detracts from readability. | The layout uses spacing, headings, and subheadings appropriately. Background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. | The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with expert use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors are present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are documented completely and correctly, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Research | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Sources provided do not support the claims of the presentation or are not credible. | Submission includes only 1-2 sources, sources broadly support claims, or some sources are not credible. | Research is relevant and supports the information presented. All of the criteria stated in the assignment are addressed. | Research strongly supports the information presented. Sources are timely, distinctive and clearly address all of the criteria stated in the assignment. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. | Submission includes mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few are present. Varieties of effective sentence structures and figures of speech are used, as well as appropriate practice and content-related language. | Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
mdavis_1
Rubric_Print_Format1.xlsx
