| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| CNL-501 | CNL-501-O502 | Assessment and Diagnosis (Obj. 2.1 and 2.2) | 100.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 70.0% |
| Define screening, assessment, and treatment | 10.0% | Essay omits or incompletely describes screening, assessment, and treatment.Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Essay inadequately describes screening, assessment, and treatment, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic. | Essay adequately describes screening, assessment, and treatment, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Essay clearly describes screening, assessment, and treatment, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic. | Essay expertly describes screening, assessment, and treatment, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Assessment process for identifying addictive disorders | 10.0% | Essay omits or incompletely discusses the assessment process for assessing and diagnosing clients for addictive disorders.Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Essay inadequately discusses the assessment process for assessing and diagnosing clients for addictive disorders, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic. | Essay adequately discusses the assessment process for assessing and diagnosing clients for addictive disorders, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Essay clearly discusses the assessment process for assessing and diagnosing clients for addictive disorders, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic. | Essay expertly discusses the assessment process for assessing and diagnosing clients for addictive disorders, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Considerations for selecting an appropriate assessment tool | 10.0% | Essay omits or incompletely describes the considerations when selecting an appropriate assessment tool.Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Essay inadequately describes the considerations when selecting an appropriate assessment tool, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic. | Essay adequately describes the considerations when selecting an appropriate assessment tool, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Essay clearly describes the considerations when selecting an appropriate assessment tool, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic. | Essay expertly describes the considerations when selecting an appropriate assessment tool, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| General overview of the substance use disorder criteria according to the DSM | 10.0% | Essay omits or incompletely discusses the substance use disorder criteria according to the DSM.Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Essay inadequately discusses the substance use disorder criteria according to the DSM, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic. | Essay adequately discusses the substance use disorder criteria according to the DSM, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Essay clearly discusses the substance use disorder criteria according to the DSM, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic. | Essay expertly discusses the substance use disorder criteria according to the DSM, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Discuss the potential problems that can arise when relying solely on the diagnostic criteria listed in the DSM for treatment planning | 10.0% | Essay omits or incompletely discusses the potential problems that can arise when relying solely on the diagnostic criteria listed in the DSM for treatment planning.Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Essay inadequately discusses the potential problems that can arise when relying solely on the diagnostic criteria listed in the DSM for treatment planning, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic. | Essay adequately discusses the potential problems that can arise when relying solely on the diagnostic criteria listed in the DSM for treatment planning, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Essay clearly discusses the potential problems that can arise when relying solely on the diagnostic criteria listed in the DSM for treatment planning, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic. | Essay expertly discusses the potential problems that can arise when relying solely on the diagnostic criteria listed in the DSM for treatment planning, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| At least two examples of commonly used substance use disorder assessment tools | 10.0% | Essay omits or incompletely discusses at least two examples commonly used substance use disorder assessment tools.Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Essay inadequately discusses at least two examples commonly used substance use disorder assessment tools, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic. | Essay adequately discusses at least two examples commonly used substance use disorder assessment tools, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Essay clearly discusses at least two examples commonly used substance use disorder assessment tools, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic. | Essay expertly discusses at least two examples commonly used substance use disorder assessment tools, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| The need for crisis management when working with a client | 10.0% | Essay omits or incompletely describes the need for crisis management when working with a client.Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Essay inadequately describes the need for crisis management when working with a client, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic. | Essay adequately describes the need for crisis management when working with a client, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Essay clearly describes the need for crisis management when working with a client, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic. | Essay expertly describes the need for crisis management when working with a client, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Organization and Effectiveness | 20.0% |
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. | Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive, reflective of the arguments, and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Format | 10.0% |
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Rachaelm1
Rubric_Print_Format1.xlsx
