| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| CNL-500 | CNL-500-O503 | Feminist, Solution-Focused, and Narrative Therapy Application (Obj. 7.1 and 7.2) | 100.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 70.0% |
| Goals of Counseling and Intervention Strategies | 10.0% | Discussion of what the goals of counseling are and what intervention strategies are used to accomplish the goals is not present or not discernible to the reader.Discussion of the goals of counseling and intervention strategies does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Discussion of what the goals of counseling are and what intervention strategies are used to accomplish the goals is incomplete or flawed.Discussion of the goals of counseling and intervention strategies demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. | Discussion of what the goals of counseling are and what intervention strategies are used to accomplish the goals is accurate and complete.Discussion of the goals of counseling and intervention strategies demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Discussion of what the goals of counseling are and what intervention strategies are used to accomplish the goals is thorough and well-reasoned.Discussion of the goals of counseling and intervention strategies demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic. | Discussion of what the goals of counseling are and what intervention strategies are used to accomplish the goals is thorough, well-reasoned, and fully supported.Discussion of the goals of counseling and intervention strategies demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Process of Treatment | 15.0% | Discussion of the process of treatment using the chosen theory including the length of treatment, the role of the counselor, and the experience of the client as they work from beginning to termination of therapy is not present or not discernible to the reader.Discussion of the process of treatment using the chosen theory does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Discussion of the process of treatment using the chosen theory including the length of treatment, the role of the counselor, and the experience of the client as they work from beginning to termination of therapy is incomplete or flawed.Discussion of the process of treatment using the chosen theory demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. | Discussion of the process of treatment using the chosen theory including the length of treatment, the role of the counselor, and the experience of the client as they work from beginning to termination of therapy is accurate and complete.Discussion of the process of treatment using the chosen theory demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Discussion of the process of treatment using the chosen theory including the length of treatment, the role of the counselor, and the experience of the client as they work from beginning to termination of therapy is thorough and well-reasoned.Discussion of the process of treatment using the chosen theory demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic. | Discussion of the process of treatment using the chosen theory including the length of treatment, the role of the counselor, and the experience of the client as they work from beginning to termination of therapy is thorough, well-reasoned, and fully supported.Discussion of the process of treatment using the chosen theory demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Social and Cultural Needs of the Client | 15.0% | Discussion of how the chosen theory addresses the social and cultural needs of the client with specific research findings is not present or not discernible to the reader.Discussion of how the chosen theory addresses the social and cultural needs of the client does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Discussion of how the chosen theory addresses the social and cultural needs of the client with specific research findings is incomplete or flawed.Discussion of the role of empathy from a person-centered perspective demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. | Discussion of how the chosen theory addresses the social and cultural needs of the client with specific research findings is accurate and complete.Discussion of the role of empathy from a person-centered perspective demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Discussion of how the chosen theory addresses the social and cultural needs of the client with specific research findings is thorough and well-reasoned.Discussion of the role of empathy from a person-centered perspective demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic. | Discussion of how the chosen theory addresses the social and cultural needs of the client with specific research findings is thorough, well-reasoned, and fully supported.Discussion of the role of empathy from a person-centered perspective demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Constructivist Philosophy | 15.0% | Discussion of how your chosen theory supports the use of a constructivist philosophy throughout the counseling process and how a collaborative approach changes the ability for clients to create and accomplish their goals through counseling services is not present or not discernible to the reader.Discussion of how your chosen theory supports the use of a constructivist philosophy does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Discussion of how your chosen theory supports the use of a constructivist philosophy throughout the counseling process and how a collaborative approach changes the ability for clients to create and accomplish their goals through counseling services is incomplete or flawed.Discussion of how your chosen theory supports the use of a constructivist philosophy demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. | Discussion of how your chosen theory supports the use of a constructivist philosophy throughout the counseling process and how a collaborative approach changes the ability for clients to create and accomplish their goals through counseling services is accurate and complete.Discussion of the role of choice and decision making within the chosen theory demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Discussion of how your chosen theory supports the use of a constructivist philosophy throughout the counseling process and how a collaborative approach changes the ability for clients to create and accomplish their goals through counseling services is thorough and well-reasoned.Discussion of how your chosen theory supports the use of a constructivist philosophy demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic. | Discussion of how your chosen theory supports the use of a constructivist philosophy throughout the counseling process and how a collaborative approach changes the ability for clients to create and accomplish their goals through counseling services is thorough, well-reasoned, and fully supported.Discussion of how your chosen theory supports the use of a constructivist philosophy demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Post-Modern/Collaborative Approaches | 15.0% | Discussion of how a counselor who utilizes post-modern/collaborative approaches should interact with their clients in order to prevent undue harm, risk, or confusion from impeding the progress of therapy is not present or not discernible to the reader.Discussion of how a counselor who utilizes post-modern/collaborative approaches should interact with their clients does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Discussion of how a counselor who utilizes post-modern/collaborative approaches should interact with their clients in order to prevent undue harm, risk, or confusion from impeding the progress of therapy is incomplete or flawed.Discussion of how a counselor who utilizes post-modern/collaborative approaches should interact with their clients demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. | Discussion of how a counselor who utilizes post-modern/collaborative approaches should interact with their clients in order to prevent undue harm, risk, or confusion from impeding the progress of therapy is accurate and complete.Discussion of how a counselor who utilizes post-modern/collaborative approaches should interact with their clients demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Discussion of how a counselor who utilizes post-modern/collaborative approaches should interact with their clients in order to prevent undue harm, risk, or confusion from impeding the progress of therapy s is thorough and well-reasoned.Discussion of how a counselor who utilizes post-modern/collaborative approaches should interact with their clients demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic. | Discussion of how a counselor who utilizes post-modern/collaborative approaches should interact with their clients in order to prevent undue harm, risk, or confusion from impeding the progress of therapy is thorough, well-reasoned, and fully supported.Discussion of how a counselor who utilizes post-modern/collaborative approaches should interact with their clients demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Organization and Effectiveness | 20.0% |
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. | Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Format | 10.0% |
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Rachaelm1
Rubric_Print_Format1.xlsx
