Catherine Owens

profileSwoosh90s
Rubric_Print_Format.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
SEC-530 SEC-530-O500 Project-Based Learning Handout 65.0
Criteria Percentage No Submission (0.00%) Insufficient (69.00%) Approaching (74.00%) Acceptable (87.00%) Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Criteria 100.0%
Project-based Learning Description 15.0% Not addressed. Handout includes an incomplete description of project-based learning with irrelevant details as to how it can be implemented in a humanities content area classroom and does not explain how it can link to prior content knowledge and student experiences. Handout includes an overly simplistic description of project-based learning and broad details as to how it can be implemented into a humanities content area classroom and/or does not explain how it can link to prior content knowledge and student experiences. Handout includes an accurate description of project-based learning and clear details as to how it can be implemented into a humanities content area classroom and explains how it can link to prior content knowledge and student experiences. Handout includes a thorough and insightful description of project-based learning and in-depth details as to how it can be implemented into a humanities content area classroom and specifically explains how it can link to prior content knowledge and student experiences. Refer to my comments on your document. 6.73/9.75
Humanities Learning Experience 20.0% Not addressed. Handout includes a poor and irrelevant humanities content area learning experience that does not develop student knowledge and skills using cross-disciplinary instruction. Handout includes a vague humanities content area learning experience that does not clearly develop student knowledge and skills using cross-disciplinary instruction. Handout includes a relevant humanities content area learning experience that competently develops student knowledge and skills using cross-disciplinary instruction. Handout includes a realistic humanities content area learning experience that creatively develops student knowledge and skills using cross-disciplinary instruction. Not included 0.00/13.00
Digital Resources 15.0% Not addressed. Handout does not include two examples that assist in project-based learning. Handout includes two simple and basic examples that assist in project-based learning. Handout includes two detailed and suitable examples that assist in project-based learning. Handout includes two well researched and insightful examples that assist in project-based learning. Not included 0.00/9.75
Reflection 20.0% Not addressed. Reflection includes an unclear summary of the importance of including project-based learning for cross-disciplinary instruction and a poor explanation as to how to implement project-based learning in future professional practice. Reflection includes a minimal summary of the importance of including project-based learning for cross-disciplinary instruction and a vague explanation as to how to implement project-based learning in future professional practice. Reflection includes a solid summary of the importance of including project-based learning for cross-disciplinary instruction and a descriptive explanation as to how to implement project-based learning in future professional practice. Reflection includes a skillful summary of the importance of including project-based learning for cross-disciplinary instruction and an in-depth explanation as to how to implement project-based learning in future professional practice. Good Job! 13.00/13.00
Research 10.0% Not addressed. Sources provided do not support the claims of the handout or are not credible. Submission includes only 1-2 sources, sources broadly support claims, or some sources are not credible. Research is relevant and supports the information presented. All of the criteria stated in the assignment are addressed. Research strongly supports the information presented. Sources are timely, distinctive and clearly address all of the criteria stated in the assignment. You included one reference on the Reference page. Per the assignment details: Support your presentation and reflection with at least two scholarly resources. 4.49/6.50
Handout Organization and Visual Appeal 10.0% Not addressed. The work is not neat or organized. Work would not be presentable for public dissemination. There are few or no graphic elements or variation in layout, type size, and color. The overall appearance and organization of material is generally acceptable. Work would be adequate for public dissemination. Minimal use of graphic elements is evident. Elements do not consistently contribute to the understanding of concepts. There is some variation in layout, type size, and color. The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor organizational flaws. Work would be desirable for public dissemination. Thematic graphic elements are used, but not always in context. Visual connections mostly contribute to the understanding of concepts. Differences in layout, type size, and color are well used and consistent. The work is well presented. The overall appearance is neat and professional. Work would be highly desirable for public dissemination. Appropriate and thematic graphic elements are used to make visual connections that contribute to the understanding of concepts. Differences in layout, type size, and color are expertly used. Refer to my comments on your document. 4.49/6.50
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 10.0% Not addressed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. Submission includes mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. Submission is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few are present. A variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech are used, as well as appropriate practice and content-related language. Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. Your reflection is well written. 6.50/6.50
Total Weightage 100% 35.20/65.0