| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| EMM-485 | EMM-485-O500 | COOP Plan Part 2: Essential Teams and Personnel Essay | 90.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Unsatisfactory (65.00%) | Satisfactory (75.00%) | Good (85.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 70.0% |
| Identify and describe the roles of the key positions and resources for each in regards to the below (5) five types of teams in a 1,000-1,500-word essay: A. The Executive Team. | 10.0% | Essay omits or incompletely describes the role of the Executive Team and resources needed for this team. | Essay inadequately describes the role of the Executive Team and resources needed for this team. Explanation of is weak and lacks much clarity. | Essay describes the role of the Executive Team and resources needed for this team. Explanation is somewhat limited and lacks some clarity. | Essay clearly describes the role of the Executive Team and resources needed for this team. Explanation is strong, showing sound analysis. | Essay expertly describes the role of the Executive Team and resources needed for this team. Explanation is comprehensive and insightful. |
| B. The Advance Team. | 10.0% | Essay omits or incompletely describes the role of the Advance Team and resources needed for this team. | Essay inadequately describes the role of the Advance Team and resources needed for this team. Explanation of is weak and lacks much clarity. | Essay describes the role of the Advance Team and resources needed for this team. Explanation is somewhat limited and lacks some clarity. | Essay clearly describes the role of the Advance Team and resources needed for this team. Explanation is strong, showing sound analysis. | Essay expertly describes the role of the Advance Team and resources needed for this team. Explanation is comprehensive and insightful. |
| C. The Operations Team. | 10.0% | Essay omits or incompletely describes the role of the Operations Team and resources needed for this team. | Essay inadequately describes the role of the Operations Team and resources needed for this team. Explanation of is weak and lacks much clarity. | Essay describes the role of the Operations Team and resources needed for this team. Explanation is somewhat limited and lacks some clarity. | Essay clearly describes the role of the Operations Team and resources needed for this team. Explanation is strong, showing sound analysis. | Essay expertly describes the role of the Operations Team and resources needed for this team. Explanation is comprehensive and insightful. |
| D. Support Teams. | 10.0% | Essay omits or incompletely describes the role of the Support Team and resources needed for this team. | Essay inadequately describes the role of the Support Team and resources needed for this team. Explanation of is weak and lacks much clarity. | Essay describes the role of the Support Team and resources needed for this team. Explanation is somewhat limited and lacks some clarity. | Essay clearly describes the role of the Support Team and resources needed for this team. Explanation is strong, showing sound analysis. | Essay expertly describes the role of the Support Team and resources needed for this team. Explanation is comprehensive and insightful. |
| E. Contingency Teams | 10.0% | Essay omits or incompletely describes the role of the Contingency Team and resources needed for this team. | Essay omits or incompletely describes the role of the Contingency Team and resources needed for this team. | Essay inadequately describes the role of the Contingency Team and resources needed for this team. Explanation of is weak and lacks much clarity. | Essay describes the role of the Contingency Team and resources needed for this team. Explanation is somewhat limited and lacks some clarity. | Essay clearly describes the role of the Contingency Team and resources needed for this team. Explanation is strong, showing sound analysis. |
| F. Lastly, create a chart roster reflecting each team’s personnel to support COOP plan. If your town doesn’t have personnel for each role or position, provide an explanation for how your COOP will address these limitations. | 20.0% | Essay omits or incompletely creates a chart roster reflecting each team’s personnel to support COOP plan. Or if the town doesn’t have personnel for each role, no explanation for how the COOP will address these limitations is given. | Essay inadequately creates a chart roster reflecting each team’s personnel to support COOP plan. Chart is weak and lacks much clarity. Or if the town doesn’t have personnel for each role, explanation for how the COOP will address these limitations is weak. | Essay creates a chart roster reflecting each team’s personnel to support COOP plan. Chart is somewhat limited and lacks some clarity. Or if the town doesn’t have personnel for each role, explanation for how the COOP will address these limitations is somewhat limited. | Essay clearly creates a chart roster reflecting each team’s personnel to support COOP plan. Chart is strong and clear. Or if the town doesn’t have personnel for each role, explanation for how the COOP will address these limitations is strong. | Essay expertly creates a chart roster reflecting each team’s personnel to support COOP plan. Chart is comprehensive and clear. Or if the town doesn’t have personnel for each role, explanation for how the COOP will address these limitations is comprehensive. |
| Organization and Effectiveness | 20.0% |
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Format | 10.0% |
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Shane AK
Rubric_Print_Format.xlsx
