640 paper

profileKyeugelowitz1
Rubric_Print_Format.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
ECE-640 ECE-640-O500 Creating a Social Studies Lesson 75.0
Criteria Percentage No Submission (0.00%) Insufficient (69.00%) Approaching (74.00%) Acceptable (87.00%) Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Criteria 100.0%
Lesson Summary and Focus: Integration 10.0% Not addressed. The lesson inappropriately integrates the cultural background, personal knowledge, family, and community of young children into social studies lessons. The lesson artificially integrates the cultural background, personal knowledge, family, and community of young children into social studies lessons. The lesson appropriately integrates the cultural background, personal knowledge, family, and community of young children into social studies lessons. The lesson is well crafted to integrate the cultural background, personal knowledge, family, and community of young children into social studies lessons.
Lesson Plan: Objectives Aligned with Standard 10.0% Not addressed. Stated objectives are inadequately aligned with the social studies state standards and ensure the objectives relate to the social studies standards. Stated objectives are ambiguously aligned with the social studies state standards and ensure the objectives relate to the social studies standards. Stated objectives are aligned with the social studies state standards and ensure the objectives relate to the social studies standards. Stated objectives are specific, attainable, realistic, and time-bound. Stated objectives are specifically aligned to social studies.
Academic Language: Content-Related Vocabulary 5.0% Not addressed. Unrealistically includes content-related, age appropriate vocabulary that expands students’ awareness of the local and global issues. Ambiguously includes content-related, age appropriate vocabulary that expands students’ awareness of the local and global issues. Correctly includes content-related, age appropriate vocabulary that expands students’ awareness of the local and global issues. Substantially includes content-related, age appropriate vocabulary that expands students’ awareness of the local and global issues.
Multiple Means of Representation: Differentiation 15.0% Not addressed. Poorly explains how instruction is differentiated to support students with language development delays or challenges. Vaguely explains how instruction is differentiated to support students with language development delays or challenges. Correctly explains how instruction is differentiated to support students with language development delays or challenges. Compellingly explains how instruction is differentiated to support students with language development delays or challenges.
Multiple Means of Engagement: Application of Standards 15.0% Not addressed. Inadequately explains how the lesson uses and develops cross-disciplinary skills in varied contexts. Inexplicitly explains how the lesson uses and develops cross-disciplinary skills in varied contexts. Logically explains how the lesson uses and develops cross-disciplinary skills in varied contexts. Skillfully explains how the lesson uses and develops cross-disciplinary skills in varied contexts.
Multiple Means of Expression: Assessments 15.0% Not addressed. Developmentally appropriate assessments imprecisely explain how they align to the content-area standards and ineffectively measure learning objectives. Developmentally appropriate assessments inexplicitly explain how they align to the content-area standards and inconsistently measure learning objectives. Developmentally appropriate assessments directly explain how they align to the content-area standards and competently measure learning objectives. Developmentally appropriate assessments innovatively explain how they align to the content-area standards and expertly measure learning objectives.
Organization 10.0% Not addressed. An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized; may not relate to each other. The content may not be adequately organized even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea. The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The content is well organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas related to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit. Provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 10.0% Not addressed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Varieties of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
Format and Documentation of Sources (layout, citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 10.0% Not addressed. Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some key formatting and citation errors are present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are documented completely and correctly, as appropriate to assignment and style. Format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%