| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| NUR-648E | NUR-648E-O501 | Course Design Outline | 70.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory 0-75% (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%) | Satisfactory 81-88% (88.00%) | Good 89-92% (92.00%) | Excellent 93-100% (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Criteria | 100.0% |
| Summary of Health Care Practice | 10.0% | A summary of the selected health care practice is not present. | A summary of the selected health care practice is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | A summary of the selected health care practice is present. | A summary of the selected health care practice is present and well developed. | A summary of the selected health care practice is thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
| Evidence-Based Article Rationale and Summary | 10.0% | Three articles are not present. Rationale and summary of each article are not present. | Three articles are present. Rationale and summary of each article are present, but lack detail or are incomplete. | Three articles are present. Rationale and summary of each article are present. | Three articles are present. Rationale and summary of each article are present and well developed. | Three articles are present. Rationale and summary of each article are thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
| Settings | 10.0% | A selection of two different settings and an explanation of their influence on course design are not present. | A selection of two different settings and an explanation of their influence on course design are present, but lack detail or are incomplete. | A selection of two different settings and an explanation of their influence on course design are present. | A selection of two different settings and an explanation of their influence on course design are present and well developed. | A selection of two different settings and an explanation of their influence on course design are thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
| Course Design Outline | 40.0% | Course design outline is not present. | Course design outline is present including the four steps of the course design process, but lacks detail or are incomplete. | Course design outline is present including the four steps of the course design process. | Course design outline including the four steps of the course design process is present and well developed. | Course design outline including the four steps of the course design process is thorough. |
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
aleena28
Rubric_Print_Format.xlsx
