| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| POS-500 | POS-500-O500 | Field Experience | 200.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Category | 90.0% |
| Describe each item addressed at the board meeting. What was being discussed and why? | 20.0% | Reflection is missing or does not mention any items addressed at the meeting or why it was being discussed. | Reflection mentions items that were addressed at the board meeting but offers no elaboration as to why. | Reflection mentions items that were addressed at the board meeting with a basic explanation of why they were presented. | Reflection mentions items that were addressed at the board meeting with a detailed explanation of why they were presented. | Reflection discusses items that were addressed at the board meeting with a detailed and relevant explanation of why they were presented. |
| Explain who was in attendance at the meeting. What kinds of people were there? Why were they there? Were you surprised by who attended? | 15.0% | Reflection does not mention who was in attendance, what kinds of people were there, why they were there, or offer any personal opinions about attendees. | Reflection mentions who was in attendance but offers no further elaboration on what types of people were present or why they were there. No personal opinion on attendees was provided. | Reflection explains who was in attendance, along with a basic explanation of what types of people were present and why they were there. Brief personal opinion about attendees is shared. | Reflection explains who was in attendance with a detailed description of different types of people present, and why they were present. A thoughtful opinion is expressed about attendees. | Reflection explains who was in attendance with a detailed description of different types of people present, and why they were present. An insightful and professionally relevant opinion is expressed about attendees. |
| Describe who presented at the meeting. Were the presentations civil? Did you agree with one side or another of the arguments? | 15.0% | Reflection does not state who presented at the board meeting, elaborate on the civility of the presentations, or offer any personal opinions about the arguments. | Reflection mentions who presented but offers no description of the civility of the presentations. No personal opinion about the arguments is presented. | Reflection describes who presented at the meeting and elaborates on the civility of the presentations. A basic personal opinion statement is provided in regard to the arguments. | Reflection describes who presented at the meeting and offers a detailed account of the civility of the presentations. A thoughtful personal opinion is provided in regard to the arguments. | Reflection describes who presented at the meeting and offers a detailed account of the civility of the presentations. A thoughtful personal opinion is provided in regard to the arguments with an explanation as to why they feel this way. |
| What you learned at this board meeting | 20.0% | Reflection does not address what was learned from this board meeting. | Reflection mentions only one item that was learned from this board meeting, explanation is vague or unclear. | Reflection adequately addresses what was learned from this board meeting. | Reflection clearly describes what was learned from this board meeting. Reflection is detailed. | Reflection describes in detail what was learned from this board meeting. Reflection is thoughtful and comprehensive. |
| How you will use what you learned as a teacher | 20.0% | Reflection does not discuss how they will use what they have learned as a teacher. | Reflection mentions suggestions as to what they learned that they will use as a teacher, but makes no mention of how. | Reflection adequately discusses how they will use what they have learned as a teacher. | Reflection clearly discusses how they will use what they have learned as a teacher. Reflection is detailed. | Reflection describes in detail how they will use what they have learned as a teacher. Reflection is thoughtful and comprehensive. |
| Organization and Effectiveness | 10.0% |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Purpose Development and 500-750-word count | 5.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Reflection does not meet the minimum word count. | Reflection purpose is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Reflection does not meet the minimum word count. | Reflection purpose is apparent and appropriate. Reflection meets the minimum word count. | Reflection purpose is clear and descriptive. Reflection meets the minimum word count. | Reflection is comprehensive and the purpose of the paper clear. Reflection meets the minimum word count and does not exceed maximum word count. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Kyeugelowitz1
Rubric_Print_Format.xlsx
