| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| HLT-364 | HLT-364-O101 | Business Research Proposal | 80.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) | Satisfactory (75.00%) | Good (85.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 70.0% |
| Description of Health Care Proposal | 15.0% | A description of the health care administration issue or barrier is not presented. | An incomplete or inaccurate description of the health care administration issue or barrier is presented. Significant detail or evidence is needed. | A summary of the health care administration issue or barrier is presented. More information or detail is needed to fully describe the health care problem. | A description of the health care administration issue or barrier is presented. Some minor details or evidence is needed. | A description of the health care administration issue or barrier is clearly presented. Strong supporting evidence is provided. |
| Summarization of Stakeholders Affected By Health Care Administration Issue or Barrier | 15.0% | A summarization of the stakeholders affected by the health care administration issue or barrier is not presented. | An incomplete summary of stakeholders is presented. More information is needed to provide a comprehensive understanding of how the stakeholders are affected by the health care administration issue or barrier. | A general summary of stakeholders is presented. Some additional information is needed to fully illustrate how the stakeholders are affected by the health care administration problem. | A complete summary of stakeholders is presented. Adequate information is provided to explain how stakeholders are affected by the health care administration problem. | A strong summary of all stakeholders is presented. Detailed information explains how stakeholders are directly or indirectly affected by the health care administration problem. |
| Relevance of Problem to Business Research | 20.0% | The health care administration problem and its relationship to business research are not presented. The problem presented is not within the scope of a health care administrative problem. | The health care administration problem and a relationship to business research are referenced, but a relationship between the two is not established. Significant information and evidence is needed to explain how business research is relevant and supports the problem. | The health care administration problem and a relationship to business research are somewhat evident, but some parts of the summary are unclear. A relationship between the two is not strongly established. Some information or evidence is needed to fully establish how business research is relevant and supports the problem. | The health care administration problem and a relationship to business research are evident. Information and evidence are presented that demonstrate how business research is relevant and supports the problem. | The health care administration problem and a relationship to business research are thoroughly discussed. Detailed information and strong evidence are supplied that demonstrate how business research is highly relevant to supporting the problem. |
| Article Supporting Proposed Topic | 20.0% | A qualitative or quantitative article is not provided. | An article is provided that relates to the proposed topic, but the article is not qualitative or quantitative. | A qualitative or quantitative article relating to the proposed topic is provided. The article has some relevance to the proposed topic. | A qualitative or quantitative article relating to the proposed topic is provided. The article is relevant to the proposed topic. | A qualitative or quantitative article relating to the proposed topic is provided. The article is highly relevant to, and provides strong support for, the proposed topic. |
| Organization and Effectiveness | 20.0% |
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Format | 10.0% |
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
avett2012
Rubric_Print_Format.xlsx
