| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| ECE-501 | ECE-501-O500 | Philosophers in the Classroom | 100.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (69.00%) | Approaching (74.00%) | Acceptable (87.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Criteria | 100.0% |
| Description of Educational Philosophies | 25.0% | Not addressed. | Description of each philosophy is inadequate, unconvincing, and does not include all of the components required (origin, proponents, and main tenets). | Description of each philosophy is vague, cursory, and includes most of the components required (origin, proponents, and main tenets). | Description of each philosophy is logical, reasonable, and includes all of the components required (origin, proponents, and main tenets). | Description of each philosophy is comprehensive, detailed, and includes all of the components required (origin, proponents, and main tenets). |
| Associated Philosopher and Timeframe | 25.0% | Not addressed. | Description of the philosopher associated with each philosopher and the timeframe in which it was developed is inadequate and unconvincing. | Description of the philosopher associated with each philosopher and the timeframe in which it was developed is cursory and vague. | Description of the philosopher associated with each philosopher and the timeframe in which it was developed is reasonable and logical. | Description of the philosopher associated with each philosopher and the timeframe in which it was developed is comprehensive and detailed. |
| Philosophy Alignment with NAEYC Standards and the Child-Centered Approach | 25.0% | Not addressed. | Inadequate and unconvincing explanation of how each philosophy aligns or does not align with the NAEYC standards and the child-centered approach. | Vague and cursory explanation of how each philosophy aligns or does not align with the NAEYC standards and the child-centered approach. | Logical and reasonable explanation of how each philosophy aligns or does not align with the NAEYC standards and the child-centered approach. | Thorough and detailed explanation of how each philosophy aligns or does not align with the NAEYC standards and the child-centered approach. |
| Organization | 10.0% | Not addressed. | An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other. | The content could be organized better even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea. | The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. | The content is well organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. |
| Research Citations and Format | 5.0% | Not addressed. | Many citations are missing where needed; or many of the sources are inappropriate for the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but many aspects are missing or mistaken. | Some citations may be missing or do not completely support the submission. References page may include errors. Some sources may not be appropriate for the submission. | All sources are credible, adequate, and support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission. | All sources are credible, appropriate, and strongly support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Varieties of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Kyeugelowitz1
Rubric_Print_Format.xlsx
