| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| LDR-615 | LDR-615-O500 | Benchmark - Employee Innovation Plan | 100.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 70.0% |
| Innovative Practices | 10.0% | A description of how innovative practices can be incorporated within the organization is not included. | A description of how innovative practices can be incorporated within the organization is included, but lacks substantial detail. | A description of how innovative practices can be incorporated within the organization is minimally included. | An appropriate description of how innovative practices can be incorporated within the organization is included. | An exemplary description of how innovative practices can be incorporated within the organization is included. |
| Intrapreneurship Competency | 15.0% | A description of how intrapreneurship competency will be embedded within the organization is not included. | A description of how intrapreneurship competency will be embedded within the organization is included, but lacks substantial detail. | A description of how intrapreneurship competency will be embedded within the organization is minimally included. | An appropriate description of how intrapreneurship competency will be embedded within the organization is included. | An exemplary description of how intrapreneurship competency will be embedded within the organization is included. |
| Identification of Intrapreneurs | 15.0% | A description of how intrapreneurs will be identified is not included. | A description of how intrapreneurs will be identified is included, but lacks substantial detail. | A description of how intrapreneurs will be identified is minimally included. | An appropriate description of how intrapreneurs will be identified is included. | An exemplary description of how intrapreneurs will be identified is included. |
| Climate of Innovative Support, Learning, and Development | 15.0% | An evaluation of how the climate of innovative support, learning, and development will be fostered is not included. | An evaluation of how the climate of innovative support, learning, and development will be fostered is included, but lacks substantial detail. | An evaluation of the climate of innovative support, learning, and development will occur is minimally included. | An appropriate evaluation of how the climate of innovative support, learning, and development will occur is included. | An exemplary evaluation of how the climate of innovative support, learning, and development will occur is included. |
| Factors for Determining Plan Effectiveness | 15.0% | Factors for determining the effectiveness of the innovation employee plan are not included or described. | Factors for determining the effectiveness of the innovation employee plan are included, but not sufficiently described. | Factors for determining the effectiveness of the innovation employee plan are included and minimally described. | Factors for determining the effectiveness of the innovation employee plan are included and appropriately described. | Factors for determining the effectiveness of the Innovation Employee Plan are included and exemplarily described. |
| Organization and Effectiveness | 20.0% |
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Format | 10.0% |
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
thornleyjaymee
Rubric_Print_Format.xlsx
