Benchmark – Connecting the Community Through Technology

profileLynette89
Rubric_Print_Format.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
ECE-530 ECE-530-O500 Benchmark – Connecting the Community Through Technology 300.0
Criteria Percentage No Submission (0.00%) Insufficient (69.00%) Approaching (74.00%) Acceptable (87.00%) Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Criteria 100.0%
School Philosophy, Mission, and Vision 10.0% Not addressed. The school's philosophy, mission, and vision are unfitting. The school's philosophy, mission, and vision are ambiguously stated. The school's philosophy, mission, and vision are clearly stated. The school's philosophy, mission, and vision are well crafted.
Readiness for Learning COE 1.2 15.0% Not addressed. A poor explanation of how each child's readiness for learning will be evaluated is included. A shallow explanation of how each child's readiness for learning will be evaluated is included. A sound explanation of each child's readiness for learning will be evaluated is included. A thorough explanation of how each child's readiness for learning will be evaluated is included.
Instructional Planning COE 1.1 15.0% Not addressed. The lesson plan inappropriately addresses young children's characteristics and needs, including strengths, interests, and needs that enable each student to advance and accelerate his or her learning. The lesson plan minimally addresses young children's characteristics and needs, including strengths, interests, and needs that enable each student to advance and accelerate his or her learning. The lesson plan effectively addresses young children's characteristics and needs, including strengths, interests, and needs that enable each student to advance and accelerate his or her learning. The lesson plan innovatively addresses young children's characteristics and needs, including strengths, interests, and needs that enable each student to advance and accelerate his or her learning.
Safety Policies 5.0% Not addressed. The safety policies are erroneous and inefficient. The safety policies are weak and unclear. The safety policies are detailed and accurate. The safety policies are comprehensive and in-depth.
Nutrition 5.0% Not addressed. The guideline for meals/snacks for the age group is insufficient. The guideline for meals/snacks for the age group is vague. The guideline for meals/snacks for the age group is suitable. The guideline for meals/snacks for the age group is substantial.
Health Policies 5.0% Not addressed. The health policies are inadequately explained. The health policies are lacking details. The health policies are properly explained. The health policies are extensively explained.
Community COE 1.6 15.0% Not addressed. Communication and collaboration with families/volunteers unconvincingly allow others to participate in the children's development and learning. Communication and collaboration with families/volunteers superficially allow others to participate in the children's development and learning. Communication and collaboration with families/volunteers successfully allow others to participate in the children's development and learning. Communication and collaboration with families/volunteers insightfully allow others to participate in the children's development and learning.
Format and Documentation of Sources (layout, citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 10.0% Not addressed. Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some key formatting and citation errors are present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources documented completely and correctly, as appropriate to assignment and style. Format is free of error.
Organization 10.0% Not addressed. An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized; may not relate to each other. The content may not be adequately organized even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea. The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The content is well organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas related to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 10.0% Not addressed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Varieties of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
Total Weightage 100%