| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (69.00%) | Approaching (74.00%) | Acceptable (87.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 100.0% |
| Observation Notes | 30.0% | Not addressed. | Observation notes are lacking and/or missing documentation of science instruction, including opportunities to reflect on prior knowledge, cultural relevance, and academic language. | Observation notes are lacking detail in the documentation of science instruction, including opportunities to reflect on prior knowledge, cultural relevance, and academic language. | Observation notes are complete and demonstrate adequate documentation of science instruction, including opportunities to reflect on prior knowledge, cultural relevance, and academic language. | Observation notes are thorough and demonstrate extensive documentation of science instruction, including opportunities to reflect on prior knowledge, cultural relevance, and academic language. |
| Reflection | 30.0% | Not addressed. | Reflection includes a poor summary of science lesson, with a weak or missing description of learning opportunities, critical thinking, student engagement, modification of instruction, and relevant materials. | Reflection includes a summary of science lesson that is unfocused, with a vague description of learning opportunities, critical thinking, student engagement, modification of instruction, and relevant materials. | Reflection includes an adequate summary of science lesson, with a basic description of learning opportunities, critical thinking, student engagement, modification of instruction, and relevant materials. | Reflection includes a thoughtful and comprehensive summary of science lesson, with a thoughtful description of learning opportunities, critical thinking, student engagement, modification of instruction, and relevant materials. |
| Future Implications | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Conclusions and applications to future practice are inappropriate or not related to assignment. | Conclusions and applications to future practice are lacking in detail of development as a professional. | Conclusions and applications to future practice are thoughtful and reflect growth and development as a professional. | Conclusions and applications to future practice are insightful and skillfully reflect growth and development as a professional. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 30.0% | Not addressed. | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking. | Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
NJK11
Rubric_Print_Format.xlsx
