Assignment 4, Building Trust

profiletrooperwarxhw3
Rubric_Print_Format.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
ADM-620 ADM-620-O500 Building Trust 110.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (87.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 70.0%
Describe the various stakeholders involved in this project with whom you may need to build trust. 15.0% Description of the various stakeholders involved in the project with whom you may need to build trust is missing. Description of the various stakeholders involved in the project with whom you may need to build trust is vague and inconsistent. Description of the various stakeholders involved in the project with whom you may need to build trust is present. Description of the various stakeholders involved in the project with whom you may need to build trust is present and clear. Description of the various stakeholders involved in the project with whom you may need to build trust is clear and concise.
Describe all the factors you should consider when taking on the goal. 20.0% Description of all factors student should consider when taking on the goal is missing. Description of all factors student should consider when taking on the goal is vague and inconsistent. Description of all factors student should consider when taking on the goal is present. Description of all factors student should consider when taking on the goal is present, clear and makes some connections to research. Description of all factors student should consider when taking on the goal is clear, concise, and makes connections to current research.
Explain how you can use your knowledge of these factors to build trust with the various parties involved. 15.0% Explanation of how student can use their knowledge of these factors to build trust with the various parties involved are missing. Explanation of how student can use their knowledge of these factors to build trust with the various parties involved are vague and inconsistent. Explanation of how student can use their knowledge of these factors to build trust with the various parties involved are present. Explanation of how student can use their knowledge of these factors to build trust with the various parties involved are present, clear and makes some connections to research. Explanation of how student can use their knowledge of these factors to build trust with the various parties involved are clear, concise, and makes connections to current research.
Recommend best practices to build trust with all stakeholders involved. 20.0% Recommendation of best practices to build trust with all stakeholders involved is missing. Recommendation of best practices to build trust with all stakeholders involved is vague and inconsistent. Recommendation of best practices to build trust with all stakeholders involved is present. Recommendation of best practices to build trust with all stakeholders involved is present, clear and makes some connections to research. Recommendation of best practices to build trust with all stakeholders involved is clear, concise, and makes connections to current research.
Organization and Effectiveness 20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format 10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%