| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| SEC-540 | SEC-540-O500 | Professional Development Presentation | 60.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (69.00%) | Approaching (74.00%) | Acceptable (87.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Criteria | 100.0% |
| Rationale | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Rationale for how writing can support learning in all content areas is unconvincing. | Rationale for how writing can support learning in all content areas is ambiguous. | Rationale for how writing can support learning in all content areas is descriptive. | Rationale for how writing can support learning in all content areas is insightful. |
| Integrating Writing into Content Area | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Examples of how to integrate writing into content area are incomplete or irrelevant. | Examples of how to integrate writing into content area are unclear. | Examples of how to integrate writing into content area are detailed. | Examples of how to integrate writing into content area are comprehensive. |
| Writing Strategies | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Writing strategies are ineffective or do not engage students in diverse perspectives and various kinds of learning in the chosen content area. | Writing strategies to engage students in diverse perspectives and various kinds of learning in the chosen content area are underdeveloped. | Writing strategies to engage students in diverse perspectives and various kinds of learning in the chosen content area are relevant. | Writing strategies to engage students in diverse perspectives and various kinds of learning in the chosen content area are compelling. |
| Writing Activities | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Writing activities are ineffective to support development of written expression in the chosen content area. | Writing activities marginally support development of written expression in the chosen content area. | Writing activities effectively support development of written expression in the chosen content area. | Writing activities thoroughly support development of written expression in the chosen content area. |
| Professional Judgement and Practical Knowledge Explanation | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Explanation of the role of professional judgement and practical knowledge for improving literacy development across all content areas is inadequate. | Explanation of the role of professional judgement and practical knowledge for improving literacy development across all content areas is vague. | Explanation of the role of professional judgement and practical knowledge for improving literacy development across all content areas is detailed and credible. | Explanation of the role of professional judgement and practical knowledge for improving literacy development across all content areas is realistic and insightful. |
| Research | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Sources provided do not support the claims of the presentation or are not credible. | Sources broadly support claims, or some sources are not credible. | Research is relevant and supports the information presented. All of the criteria stated in the assignment are addressed. | Research strongly supports the information presented. Sources are timely, distinctive and clearly address all of the criteria stated in the assignment. |
| Presentation Organization and Visual Appeal | 5.0% | Not addressed. | The work is not neat or organized. Work would not be presentable for public dissemination. There are few or no graphic elements or variation in layout, type size, and color. | The overall appearance and organization of material is generally acceptable. Work would be adequate for public dissemination. Minimal use of graphic elements is evident. Elements do not consistently contribute to the understanding of concepts. There is some variation in layout, type size, and color. | The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor organizational flaws. Work would be desirable for public dissemination. Thematic graphic elements are used, but not always in context. Visual connections mostly contribute to the understanding of concepts. Differences in layout, type size, and color are well used and consistent. | The work is well presented. The overall appearance is neat and professional. Work would be highly desirable for public dissemination. Appropriate and thematic graphic elements are used to make visual connections that contribute to the understanding of concepts. Differences in layout, type size, and color are expertly used. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Not addressed. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although several minor formatting errors are present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are documented completely and correctly, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Not addressed. | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. | Submission includes mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few are present. A variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech are used, as well as appropriate practice and content-related language. | Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
vx6
Rubric_Print_Format.xlsx
