| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| SEC-540 | SEC-540-O500 | Integrating Literacy Article | 60.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (69.00%) | Approaching (74.00%) | Acceptable (87.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Criteria | 100.0% |
| Interdisciplinary Literacy Definition | 25.0% | Not addressed. | Article inadequately defines interdisciplinary literacy and fluency as related to contemporary education. | Article minimally defines interdisciplinary literacy and fluency as related to contemporary education. | Article clearly defines interdisciplinary literacy and fluency as related to contemporary education. | Article skillfully defines interdisciplinary literacy and fluency as related to contemporary education. |
| Overview of Key Theories | 25.0% | Not addressed. | Article inaccurately explains the theories related to reading and writing processes and development. | Article vaguely explains theories and/or does not explain three theories related to reading and writing processes and development. | Article logically explains three theories related to reading and writing processes and development. | The presentation skilfully and concisely explains how literacy across content areas supports understanding of each discipline. |
| Explanation of Historically Shared Knowledge Base | 25.0% | Not addressed. | Article unconvincingly explains how cross-disciplinary instruction supports the historically shared knowledge base of literacy in all content areas. | Article marginally explains how cross-disciplinary instruction supports the historically shared knowledge base of literacy in all content areas. | Article reasonably explains how cross-disciplinary instruction supports the historically shared knowledge base of literacy in all content areas. | Article comprehensively explains how cross-disciplinary instruction supports the historically shared knowledge base of literacy in all content areas. |
| Organization | 5.0% | Not addressed. | An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized; may not relate to each other. | The content may not be adequately organized even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea. | The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. | The content is wellorganized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas related to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit. Provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. |
| Research | 5.0% | Not addressed. | Sources provided do not support the claims of article or are not credible. | Submission includes only 1-2 sources, sources broadly support claims, or some sources are not credible. | Research is relevant and supports the information presented. All of the criteria stated in the assignment are addressed. | Research strongly supports the information presented. Sources are timely, distinctive and clearly address all of the criteria stated in the assignment. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Not addressed. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although several minor formatting errors are present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are documented completely and correctly, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. | Submission includes mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few are present. A variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech are used, as well as appropriate practice and content-related language. | Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
vx6
Rubric_Print_Format.xlsx
