| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| EDU-470 | EDU-470-O500 | Troubleshooting Teaching | 45.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | No submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (65.00%) | Satisfactory (75.00%) | Acceptable (85.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 100.0% |
| Lesson Plan Alignment to Standards [ACEI 2.3, 3.1, 3.3; CEC 3.1, 3.2, 5.6, 5.7; InTASC 4(a), 4(b), 4 (e), 4 (h), 5(c), 7(a), 8(a), 8(l)] | 20.0% | Not addressed. | The lesson plan does not align to basic facts or Base-Ten Concepts standards. | The lesson plan partially aligns to basic facts or Base-Ten Concepts standards. | The lesson plan, learning target, and other content generally align to basic facts or Base-Ten Concepts standards. | The lesson plan, learning target, and other content thoroughly and consistently aligns to basic facts or Base-Ten Concepts standards. | | 0.00/0.00 |
| Section I. Planning [ACEI 2.3, 3.1, 3.3; CEC 3.1, 3.2, 5.6, 5.7; InTASC 4(a), 4(b), 4 (e), 4 (h), 5(c), 7(a), 8(a), 8(l)] | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Section ?I. Planning? is missing key pieces, or is inappropriate for the grade identified. Activity differentiation is inappropriate or unclear. | Information is lacking detail, but appears adequate for grade identified. One or two parts of section ?I. Planning? may be missing. Activity differentiation is adequate. | All parts of section ?I. Planning? are clear and appropriate for the grade identified. Activity differentiation is appropriate. | All parts of section ?I. Planning? are thorough and adeptly completed for the grade identified. Activity differentiation is well-crafted. | | 0.00/0.00 |
| Ten Questions [ACEI 2.3, 3.3, 3.4; CEC 5.6, 5.7; InTASC 4(d), 5(d), 5(f), 6(e), 7(d), 8(f), (8(i)] | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Questions submitted do not promote conceptual understanding related to fractions. | Ten questions are submitted that partially promote conceptual understanding related to fractions, or questions are high quality, or less than ten are presented | Ten questions that promote conceptual understanding related to basic facts or Base-Ten Concepts are clear and appropriate. | Ten questions that promote conceptual understanding related to basic facts or Base-Ten Concepts are expertly drafted. | | 0.00/0.00 |
| Troubleshooting Table [ACEI 2.3, 3.1, 3.3; CEC 3.1, 3.2, 5.6, 5.7; InTASC 4(a), 4(b), 4 (e), 4 (h), 5(c), 7(a), 8(a), 8(l)] | 20.0% | Not addressed. | The troubleshooting table does not address issues that may arise from instruction related to basic facts or Base-Ten Concepts standards, or addresses them inappropriately for the students. | The troubleshooting table minimally addresses issues that may arise from instruction related to basic facts or Base-Ten Concepts standards, or includes less than five issues. | The troubleshooting table adequately addresses five issues that may arise from instruction related to basic facts or Base-Ten Concepts standards | The troubleshooting table adeptly addresses five issues that may arise from instruction related to basic facts or Base-Ten Concepts standards | | 0.00/0.00 |
| Originality | 5.0% | Not addressed. | The work is a minimal collection or rehash of the ideas, products, images, or inventions of other people. There is no evidence of new thought | The product shows evidence of originality. While based on the ideas, products, images, or inventions of other people, the work does offer some new insights. | The product shows evidence of originality and inventiveness. While based somewhat on the ideas, products, images, or inventions of other people, the work extends beyond that collection to offer new insights. | The product shows significant evidence of originality and inventiveness. The majority of the content and many of the ideas are fresh, original, inventive, and based upon logical conclusions and sound research. | | 0.00/0.00 |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Not addressed. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | | 0.00/0.00 |
| Mechanics (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. | Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech, as well as appropriate practice and content-related language. | Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. | | 0.00/0.00 |
| Total Weightage | 100% | | | | | | | | 0.00/45.0 |
quoerh5holly
Rubric_Print_Format.xlsx
