| Course Code | Class Code |
| ELM-560 | ELM-560-O501 | Number and Operations Lesson Plan | 80.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (69.00%) | Approaching (74.00%) | Acceptable (87.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 100.0% |
| COE Lesson Plan Template | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Uses the COE Lesson Plan Template and Class Profile. Lesson plan components are missing or are inadequately addressed. | Uses the COE Lesson Plan Template and Class Profile. All lesson plan components are addressed. Details are minimal or irrelevant. | Uses the COE Lesson Plan Template and Class profile. All lesson plan components are clearly addressed in the design of an original lesson plan. | Uses the COE Lesson Plan Template and Class Profile. All lesson plan components are fully and thoroughly addressed in the design of a thoughtful and original lesson plan. |
| Instructional Strategies | 30.0% | Not addressed. | Lesson plan includes instructional strategies that are scarce in detail, vague, or incomplete. Evidence of research of instructional strategies, or alignment to objectives is deficient. The instructional strategies are inappropriate, or provide inadequate support for student engagement and motivation. Traditional and technology-enhanced activities are unclear or ambiguous. | Lesson plan includes instructional strategies. Evidence of research of instructional strategies, or alignment to objectives is limited. The appropriateness of the instructional strategies is questionable. The chosen strategies provide minimal support for student engagement and motivation. Traditional and technology-enhanced activities are minimal or irrelevant. | Lesson plan includes research-based instructional strategies that align to the learning objectives in the area of numbers and operations. Strategies are appropriate for introducing a new concept in mathematics. The chosen strategies help create student engagement and motivation. Both traditional and technology-enhanced activities are included. | Lesson plan includes well-thought out, research-based instructional strategies that skillfully align to the learning objectives in the area of numbers and operations. Strategies are clearly appropriate for introducing a new concept in mathematics. The chosen strategies insightfully help create student engagement and motivation. Both traditional and technology-enhanced activities are included and well-defined. |
| Rationale | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Rationale includes a vague reasoning for the chosen instructional strategies. Lacks an explanation of the alignment of strategies and objectives, or promotion of student engagement and motivation. Provides an an inadequate or ambiguous description of the use of digital tools or resources in the instruction of mathematics. Support with scholarly resources is missing or scarce. | Rationale includes a brief reasoning for the chosen instructional strategies. Addresses minimally alignment, student engagement, and motivation. Provides a short description of the use of digital tools or resources in the instruction of mathematics. Provides scholarly resources of marginal relevance. | Rationale includes a reasoning for the chosen instructional strategies. Explains the alignment of strategies and learning objectives, and the promotion of student engagement and motivation in mathematics. Describes the identification and integration of digital tools or resources into the instruction of mathematics. Provides support with scholarly resources. | Rationale includes a substantial reasoning for the chosen instructional strategies. Explains, with specifics, the alignment of strategies and learning objectives, and the promotion of student engagement and motivation in mathematics. Describes, in detail, the identification and integration of digital tools or resources into the instruction of mathematics. Provides strong support with relevant and valid scholarly resources. |
| Research Citations and Format | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Many citations are missing where needed; or many of the sources are inappropriate for the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but many aspects are missing or mistaken. | Some citations may be missing where needed; or some of the sources do not support the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but some aspects are missing or mistaken. | All sources are credible, adequate, and support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission. | All sources are credible, appropriate, and strongly support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking. | Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Royce0615
Rubric_Print_Format.xlsx
