revision and final business plan

avett2012

Rubric_Print_Format.pdf

Home >Applied Sciences homework help >revision and final business plan

Course Code Class Code HCA-470 HCA-470-O101

Criteria Percentage Content 65.0%

SWOT Analysis 10.0%

Financial Analysis and Budget 10.0%

Strategy 15.0%

ImplementaFon Schedule 10.0%

Strategic EvaluaFon 10.0%

Evidence of Revision 10.0%

OrganizaFon, EffecFveness, and Format 35.0%

Thesis Development and Purpose 10.0%

Argument Logic and ConstrucFon 10.0%

Mechanics of WriFng (includes spelling, punctuaFon, grammar, language use) 10.0%

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 2.0%

DocumentaFon of Sources (citaFons, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 3.0%

Total Weightage 100%

Assignment Title Business Plan Part 5: Revision and Final Business Plan

UnsaFsfactory (0.00%)

SWOT analysis, including strategic goals and idenFficaFon of four strengths, weaknesses, opportuniFes, and threats supported by credible sources is not included.

Budget table, financial data overview, and supporFng financial statement figure/appendix is not included.

Strategy, including history/raFonale, market analysis, measurable goals, project structure, stakeholder analysis, communicaFon plan, and leadership skills, is not included.

ImplementaFon schedule, including acFon steps, resources and competencies, and acFon plan alignment to the organizaFon’s strategic iniFaFves, is not included.

Discussion of tools that can be used to monitor the success of the implementaFon of the iniFaFve and explanaFon of why ongoing strategy evaluaFon and willingness and ability to adjust strategy is necessary for successful iniFaFve implementaFon is not included.

Final dra` shows no evidence of revision of the content of Parts 1-4 of the business plan.

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Statement of purpose is not jusFfied by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communicaFon of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construcFon is used.

Template is not used appropriately, or documentaFon format is rarely followed correctly.

Sources are not documented.

Total Points 200.0

Less Than SaFsfactory (65.00%)

SWOT analysis, including strategic goals and idenFficaFon of four strengths, weaknesses, opportuniFes, and threats supported by credible sources is incomplete and/or incorrect.

Budget table, financial data overview, and supporFng financial statement figure/appendix is incomplete and/or incorrect.

Strategy, including history/raFonale, market analysis, measurable goals, project structure, stakeholder analysis, communicaFon plan, and leadership skills, is incomplete and/or incorrect.

ImplementaFon schedule, including acFon steps, resources and competencies, and acFon plan alignment to the organizaFon’s strategic iniFaFves, is incomplete and/or incorrect.

Final dra` shows minimal evidence of revision of the content of Parts 1-4 of the business plan. Most instructor feedback was not implemented.

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

Sufficient jusFficaFon of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have quesFonable credibility.

Frequent and repeFFve mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formadng is apparent.

DocumentaFon of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formadng errors.

SaFsfactory (75.00%)

SWOT analysis, including strategic goa() and idenFficaFon of four strengths, weaknesses, opportuniFes, and threats is included but lacks specificity and support from credible sources.

Budget table, financial data overview, and supporFng financial statement figure/appendix is included but lacks accuracy, supporFng details and data, and/or is unrealisFc.

Strategy, including history/raFonale, market analysis, measurable goals, project structure, stakeholder analysis, communicaFon plan, and leadership skills, is included but lacks explanaFon and relevant supporFng details.

ImplementaFon schedule, including acFon steps, resources and competencies, and acFon plan alignment to the organizaFon’s strategic iniFaFves, is included but lacks clarity and specificity.

Final dra` shows evidence of revision of the content of Parts 1-4 of the business plan. Instructor feedback was parFally implemented.

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal jusFficaFon of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. IntroducFon and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracFng to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Appropriate template is used. Formadng is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formadng errors may be present.

Good (85.00%)

SWOT analysis, including strategic goals and idenFficaFon of four strengths, weaknesses, opportuniFes, and threats supported by credible sources is complete and correct.

Budget table, financial data overview, and supporFng financial statement figure/appendix is complete, mostly accurate, and includes supporFng details and data.

Strategy, including history/raFonale, market analysis, measurable goals, project structure, stakeholder analysis, communicaFon plan, and leadership skills, is complete and includes explanaFon and relevant supporFng details.

ImplementaFon schedule, including acFon steps, resources and competencies, and acFon plan alignment to the organizaFon’s strategic iniFaFves, is complete, clear, and specific.

Final dra` shows evidence of revision of the content of Parts 1-4 of the business plan. Most instructor feedback was implemented.

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descripFve and reflecFve of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentaFon are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introducFon to conclusion. Most sources are authoritaFve.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effecFve sentence structures and figures of speech.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formadng style.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Excellent (100.00%) Comments

SWOT analysis, including strategic goals and idenFficaFon of four strengths, weaknesses, opportuniFes, and threats supported by credible sources is exemplary.

Budget table, financial data overview, and supporFng financial statement figure/appendix is thorough, accurate, and includes substanFal supporFng details and data.

Strategy, including history/raFonale, market analysis, measurable goals, project structure, stakeholder analysis, communicaFon plan, and leadership skills, is thorough and includes substanFal explanaFon and relevant supporFng details.

ImplementaFon schedule, including acFon steps, resources and competencies, and acFon plan alignment to the organizaFon’s strategic iniFaFves, is exemplary.

Final dra` shows evidence of revision of the content of Parts 1-4 of the business plan. Instructor feedback was fully implemented.

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a disFncFve and compelling manner. All sources are authoritaFve.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, wrigen, academic English.

All format elements are correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Points Earned