| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| CNL-610 | CNL-610-O500 | CNL-610 Discharge Summary and Summary Statement (Obj. 8.1 and 8.2) | 100.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 70.0% |
| Part 1: Discharge Summary | 30.0% | Discharge Summary omits or incompletely describes the client’s presenting problem upon admission, current medication, reason for discharge, resources and referrals, and projected prognosis.Discharge Summary does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Discharge Summary inadequately describes the client’s presenting problem upon admission, current medication, reason for discharge, resources and referrals, and projected prognosis, but description is weak. Discharge Summary demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. | Discharge Summary adequately describes the client’s presenting problem upon admission, current medication, reason for discharge, resources and referrals, and projected prognosis, but description is limited. Discharge Summary demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Discharge Summary clearly describes the client’s presenting problem upon admission, current medication, reason for discharge, resources and referrals, and projected prognosis, and description is strong. Discharge Summary demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic. | Discharge Summary expertly describes the client’s presenting problem upon admission, current medication, reason for discharge, resources and referrals, and projected prognosis, and description is comprehensive and insightful. Discharge Summary demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Part 2: Summary Statement | 40.0% | Summary Statement omits or incompletely describes whether or not the client met the goals of the treatment plan, what contributed to the success of the treatment plan or lack thereof, what language you would use to communicate the outcome to the client, and how you would document the final session.Summary Statement does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Summary Statement inadequately describes whether or not the client met the goals of the treatment plan, what contributed to the success of the treatment plan or lack thereof, what language you would use to communicate the outcome to the client, and how you would document the final session, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Summary Statement demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. | Summary Statement adequately describes whether or not the client met the goals of the treatment plan, what contributed to the success of the treatment plan or lack thereof, what language you would use to communicate the outcome to the client, and how you would document the final session, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Summary Statement demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Summary Statement clearly describes whether or not the client met the goals of the treatment plan, what contributed to the success of the treatment plan or lack thereof, what language you would use to communicate the outcome to the client, and how you would document the final session, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Summary Statement demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic. | Summary Statement expertly describes whether or not the client met the goals of the treatment plan, what contributed to the success of the treatment plan or lack thereof, what language you would use to communicate the outcome to the client, and how you would document the final session, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Summary Statement demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Organization and Effectiveness | 20.0% |
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. | Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Format | 10.0% |
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
ittakesavillage
Rubric_Print_Format-8.xlsx
