| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| PSY-804 | PSY-804-O501 | Benchmark - Major Psychological Movements | 330.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (73.00%) | Satisfactory (82.00%) | Good (91.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 80.0% |
| Overall Historical Context of All Three Movements Benchmarks C.1.1: Discuss the history and development of the theories of Psychoanalysis, Behaviorism, and Humanistic/Transpersonal/Existential (HTE) Psychology | 15.0% | An overall historical context of all three movements is either missing or not evident to the reader. | An overall historical context of all three movements is present, but inaccurate or incomplete. | An overall historical context of all three movements is presented, but is cursory and lacking in depth. | An overall historical context of all three movements is present and thorough. | An overall historical context of all three movements is thoroughly presented with rich detail. |
| Rationale for Why Each Movement Is/Was Considered Essential to Understanding Human Behavior and Experiences | 5.0% | A rationale for why each movement is/was considered essential to understanding human behavior and experiences is not presented. | A rationale for why each movement is/was considered essential to understanding human behavior and experiences is presented, but inaccurate or illogical. | A rationale for why each movement is/was considered essential to understanding human behavior and experiences is presented, but is cursory and lacking in depth. | A rationale for why each movement is/was considered essential to understanding human behavior and experiences is presented and thorough. | A rationale for why each movement is/was considered essential to understanding human behavior and experiences is thoroughly presented with rich detail. |
| Analysis of Psychoanalysis/ Psychodynamic Theory | 5.0% | An analysis of psychoanalysis/ psychodynamic theory is either missing or not evident to the reader. | An analysis of psychoanalysis/ psychodynamic theory is presented, but inaccurate or incomplete. | An analysis of psychoanalysis/ psychodynamic theory is presented, but is cursory and lacking in depth. | An analysis of psychoanalysis/ psychodynamic theory is presented and thorough. | An analysis of psychoanalysis/ psychodynamic theory is thoroughly presented with rich detail. |
| Analysis of Behaviorism | 5.0% | An analysis of behaviorism is either missing or not evident to the reader. | An analysis of behaviorism is presented, but inaccurate or illogical. | An analysis of behaviorism is presented, but is cursory and lacking in depth. | An analysis of behaviorism is presented and thorough. | An analysis of behaviorism is thoroughly presented with rich detail. |
| Analysis of Humanistic, Transpersonal, and Existential Psychology (HTE) | 5.0% | An analysis of humanistic, transpersonal, and existential psychology (HTE) is either missing or not evident to the reader. | An analysis of humanistic, transpersonal, and existential psychology (HTE is presented, but inaccurate or illogical. | An analysis of humanistic, transpersonal, and existential psychology (HTE is presented, but is cursory and lacking in depth. | An analysis of humanistic, transpersonal, and existential psychology (HTE is presented and thorough. | An analysis of humanistic, transpersonal, and existential psychology (HTE is thoroughly presented with rich detail. |
| Synthesis of These Movements Benchmarks C.1.2: Synthesize the theories of Psychoanalysis, Behaviorism, and HTE Psychology | 15.0% | A synthesis of these movements is either missing or not evident to the reader. | A synthesis of these movements is presented, but inaccurate or illogical. | A synthesis of these movements is presented, but is cursory and lacking in depth. | A synthesis of these movements is presented and thorough. | A synthesis of these movements is thoroughly presented with rich detail. |
| Evaluation of the Applications of the Theories that were the Basis for Each of These Movements Benchmarks C.1.3: Evaluate the common applications of Psychoanalysis, Behaviorism, and HTE Psychology | 15.0% | An evaluation of the applications of the theories that were the basis for each of these movements is either missing or not evident to the reader. | An evaluation of the applications of the theories that were the basis for each of these movements is presented, but inaccurate or illogical. | An evaluation of the applications of the theories that were the basis for each of these movements is presented, but is cursory and lacking in depth. | An evaluation of the applications of the theories that were the basis for each of these movements is presented and thorough. | An evaluation of the applications of the theories that were the basis for each of these movements is thoroughly presented with rich detail. |
| Statement of Next Steps | 5.0% | A statement of next steps is either missing or not evident to the reader. | A statement of next steps is presented, but inaccurate or illogical. | A statement of next steps is presented, but is cursory and lacking in depth. | A statement of next steps is presented and thorough. | A statement of next steps is thoroughly presented with rich detail. |
| Synthesis and Argument | 10.0% | No synthesis of source information is evident. Statement of purpose is not followed to a justifiable conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses non-credible sources. | Synthesis of source information is attempted, but is not successful. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Synthesis of source information is present, but pedantic. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Synthesis of source information is present and meaningful. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Synthesis of source information is present and scholarly. Argument is clear and convincing, presenting a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| Organization and Effectiveness | 10.0% |
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 10.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. | Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are clear and comprehensive; the essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. |
| Format | 10.0% |
| Mechanics of Writing | 5.0% | Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| APA Format | 5.0% | Required format is rarely followed correctly. No reference page is included. No in-text citations are used. | Required format elements are missing or incorrect. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Reference page is present. However, in-text citations are inconsistently used. | Required format is generally correct. However, errors are present (e.g. font, cover page, margins, and in-text citations). Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented though some errors are present. | Required format is used, but minor errors are present (e.g. headings and direct quotes). Reference page is present and includes all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. | The document is correctly formatted. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
samad1500
Rubric_Print_Format-7.xlsx
