| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| CNL-610 | CNL-610-O500 | CNL-610 Treatment Plan Reassessment: Eliza (Obj. 7.1 and 7.2) | 100.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 70.0% |
| Part 1: New Treatment Plan | 30.0% | Part 1 of the assignment does not include a new treatment plan for Eliza outlining the changes made in treatment, based on the new information provided.Treatment Plan does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Part 1 of the assignment includes a new treatment plan for Eliza outlining the changes made in treatment, based on the new information provided; however, the information provided is inaccurate.Treatment Plan demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. | Part 1 of the assignment accurately includes a new treatment plan for Eliza outlining the changes made in treatment, based on the new information provided.Treatment Plan demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Part 1 of the assignment accurately includes a new treatment plan for Eliza outlining the changes made in treatment, based on the new information provided. Clearly articulates the connection between diagnosis, goals, and objectives, based on the new information provided. Treatment Plan demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic. | Part 1 of the assignment accurately includes a new treatment plan for Eliza outlining the changes made in treatment, based on the new information provided. Clearly articulates the connection between diagnosis, goals, and objectives, based on the new information provided. The new treatment plan exemplifies a thorough understanding of how to conduct a proper treatment plan reassessment.Treatment Plan demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Part 2: Summary of Changes | 5.0% | Part 2 of the assignment does not include a summary that proposes why the changes occurred with Eliza. Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment includes a summary that proposes why the changes occurred with Eliza; however, the information provided is inaccurate.Essay demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment accurately includes a summary that proposes why the changes occurred with Eliza. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment accurately includes a summary that proposes why the changes occurred with Eliza. Clearly articulates a connection between Eliza's original treatment plan and the changes that have occurred. Essay demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment accurately includes a summary about a client with a risk assessment. Clearly articulates a connection between Eliza's original treatment plan and the changes that have occurred. The summary exemplifies a thorough understanding of how to conduct a proper treatment plan reassessment. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Part 2: Summary of Reassessment | 5.0% | Part 2 of the assignment does not include a summary that reassesses the effectiveness and validity of the treatment plan, along with how the treatment plan needs to be adjusted to address changes in the situation with Eliza. Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment includes a summary that reassesses the effectiveness and validity of the treatment plan, along with how the treatment plan needs to be adjusted to address changes in the situation with Eliza; however, the information provided is inaccurate.Essay demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment accurately includes a summary that reassesses the effectiveness and validity of the treatment plan, along with how the treatment plan needs to be adjusted to address changes in the situation with Eliza. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment accurately includes a summary that reassesses the effectiveness and validity of the treatment plan, along with how the treatment plan needs to be adjusted to address changes in the situation with Eliza. Clearly articulates a connection between the effectiveness and validity of the treatment plan, along with how the plan needs to be adjusted to address changes in the situation with Eliza.Essay demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment accurately includes a summary that reassesses the effectiveness and validity of the treatment plan, along with how the treatment plan needs to be adjusted to address changes in the situation with Eliza. Clearly articulates a connection between the effectiveness and validity of the treatment plan, along with how the plan needs to be adjusted to address changes in the situation with Eliza. The summary exemplifies a thorough understanding of how to conduct a proper treatment plan reassessment. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Part 2: Summary of Justification | 5.0% | Part 2 of the assignment does not include a summary that justifies the changes from an ethical and legal standpoint. Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment includes a summary that justifies the changes from an ethical and legal standpoint; however, the information provided is inaccurate.Essay demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment accurately includes a summary that justifies the changes from an ethical and legal standpoint.Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment accurately includes a summary that justifies the changes from an ethical and legal standpoint. Clearly articulates a connection between the changes in Eliza, along with how to justify the changes from an ethical and legal standpoint. Essay demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment accurately includes a summary that justifies the changes from an ethical and legal standpoint. Clearly articulates a connection between the changes in Eliza, along with how to justify the changes from an ethical and legal standpoint. The summary exemplifies a thorough understanding of how to conduct a proper treatment plan reassessment. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Part 2: Summary of Changes (Obstacles) | 5.0% | Part 2 of the assignment does not include a summary that determines what the changes (obstacles) mean to the treatment plan for Eliza.Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment includes a summary that determines what the changes (obstacles) mean to the treatment plan for Eliza; however, the information provided is inaccurate.Essay demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment accurately includes a summary that determines what the changes (obstacles) mean to the treatment plan for Eliza.Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment accurately includes a summary that determines what the changes (obstacles) mean to the treatment plan for Eliza. Clearly articulates a connection between the changes in Eliza and what the changes mean to her treatment plan. Essay demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment accurately includes a summary that determines what the changes (obstacles) mean to the treatment plan for Eliza. Clearly articulates a connection between the changes in Eliza and what the changes mean to her treatment plan. The summary exemplifies a thorough understanding of how to conduct a proper treatment plan reassessment. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Part 2: Summary of Resources for a Referral | 5.0% | Part 2 of the assignment does not include a summary that discusses how you would evaluate the resources available for you to make a referral for Eliza.Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment includes a summary that discusses how you would evaluate the resources available for you to make a referral for Eliza; however, the information provided is inaccurate.Essay demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment accurately includes a summary that discusses how you would evaluate the resources available for you to make a referral for Eliza.Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment accurately includes a summary that discusses how you would evaluate the resources available for you to make a referral for Eliza. Clearly articulates a connection between the changes in Eliza and what the resources mean to the referral process in her treatment plan. Essay demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment accurately includes a summary that discusses how you would evaluate the resources available for you to make a referral for Eliza. Clearly articulates a connection between the changes in Eliza and what the resources mean to the referral process in her treatment plan. The summary exemplifies a thorough understanding of how to conduct a proper treatment plan reassessment. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Part 2: Summary of Communication with Client Regarding Referrals | 5.0% | Part 2 of the assignment does not include a summary that discusses how you would communicate to the client the need for referrals to other behavioral health care professionals.Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment includes a summary that discusses how you would communicate to the client the need for referrals to other behavioral health care professionals; however, the information provided is inaccurate.Essay demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment accurately includes a summary that discusses how you would communicate to the client the need for referrals to other behavioral health care professionals.Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment accurately includes a summary that discusses how you would communicate to the client the need for referrals to other behavioral health care professionals. Clearly articulates a connection between the changes in Eliza and the importance of communicating with the client. Essay demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment accurately includes a summary that discusses how you would communicate to the client the need for referrals to other behavioral health care professionals. Clearly articulates a connection between the changes in Eliza and the importance of communicating with the client. The summary exemplifies a thorough understanding of how to conduct a proper treatment plan reassessment. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Part 2: Summary of Referrals and Collaboration with Other Behavioral Health Professionals | 5.0% | Part 2 of the assignment does not include a summary that determines which referrals you would make and how you would collaborate with other behavioral health care professionals.Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment includes a summary that determines which referrals you would make and how you would collaborate with other behavioral health care professionals; however, the information provided is inaccurate.Essay demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment accurately includes a summary that determines which referrals you would make and how you would collaborate with other behavioral health care professionals.Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment accurately includes a summary that determines which referrals you would make and how you would collaborate with other behavioral health care professionals. Clearly articulates a connection between the changes in Eliza and how the collaboration process with other behavioral health professionals affects her treatment plan. Essay demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment accurately includes a summary that which referrals you would make and how you would collaborate with other behavioral health care professionals. Clearly articulates a connection between the changes in Eliza and how the collaboration process with other behavioral health professionals affects her treatment plan. The summary exemplifies a thorough understanding of how to conduct a proper treatment plan reassessment. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Part 2: Summary of Instruments to Assess Clients | 5.0% | Part 2 of the assignment does not include a summary of any instruments you would use to assess the client.Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment includes a summary of any instruments you would use to assess the client; however, the information provided is inaccurate.Essay demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment accurately includes a summary of any instruments you would use to assess the client.Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment accurately includes a summary of any instruments you would use to assess the client. Clearly articulates a connection between the changes in Eliza and how assessment instruments can be used to assist with the treatment plan. Essay demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic. | Part 2 of the assignment accurately includes a summary of any instruments you would use to assess the client. Clearly articulates a connection between the changes in Eliza and how assessment instruments can be used to assist with the treatment plan. The summary exemplifies a thorough understanding of how to conduct a proper treatment plan reassessment. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. |
| Organization and Effectiveness | 20.0% |
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. | Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Format | 10.0% |
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
ittakesavillage
Rubric_Print_Format-5.xlsx
