| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| MGT-660 | MGT-660-O500 | Benchmark - A Christian Perspective in Mission and Vision | 80.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 70.0% |
| Instructions: In 750-1,000 words, create an analysis of how a Christian worldview could impact your company’s Mission and Vision statements and its business practices. Include the following: 1. Review the company’s Mission/Vision statement. 2. Describe elements of your company’s Mission/Vision statement that reflect the organization’s commitment to contributing to the greater social good. | 20.0% | Essay does not describe the company’s Mission ans Vision statements that reflect the organization’s commitment to contributing to the greater social good. | Essay attempts to describe the company’s Mission and Vision statements that reflect the organization’s commitment to contributing to the greater social good but is inadequate. Description is weak and many missing important details. | Essay describes the company’s Mission and Vision statements that reflect the organization’s commitment to contributing to the greater social good in an adequate manner. Description is somewhat limited and lacks some essential details or clarity. | Essay describes the company’s Mission and Vision statements that reflect the organization’s commitment to contributing to the greater social good in a clear and coherent manner. Description is strong with sound details. | The discussion of the describes the company’s Mission and Vision statements that reflect the organization’s commitment to contributing to the greater social good is expertly written. Description is comprehensive and insightful with exceptional details. |
| 3. Explain how the company’s commitment to the greater social good relates to elements of a Christian worldview. (C4.1; C10.1) | 20.0% | A discussion of how the company’s commitment to the greater social good relates to elements of a Christian worldview is not present. | The discussion of how the company’s commitment to the greater social good relates to elements of a Christian worldview is inadequate. Explanation is weak and missing many important details. | The discussion of how the company’s commitment to the greater social good relates to elements of a Christian worldview is adequate. Explanation is somewhat limited and lacks some essential details or clarity. | The discussion of how the company’s commitment to the greater social good relates to elements of a Christian worldview is clear and coherent. Explanation is strong with sound details. | The discussion of how the company’s commitment to the greater social good relates to elements of a Christian worldview is expertly written. Explanation is comprehensive and insightful with exceptional details. |
| 4. Are the company’s practices consistent with a CWV? Explain. | 20.0% | Essay does not discuss whether the company’s practices are consistent with a CWV. | Essay attempts to discuss whether the company’s practices are consistent with a CWV but is inadequate. Explanation is weak and missing many important details. | The discussion of whether the company’s practices are consistent with a CWV is adequate. Explanation is somewhat limited and lacks some essential details or clarity. | The discussion of whether the company’s practices are consistent with a CWV is clear and coherent. Explanation is strong with sound and appropriate details. | The discussion of whether the company’s practices are consistent with a CWV is expertly written. Explanation is comprehensive and insightful with exceptional details. |
| Be sure to cite three to five relevant and credible sources in support of your content. Use only sources found at the GCU Library, corporate websites, or those provided in Topic Materials. | 10.0% | No outside sources are cited. | Some sources may be cited but they are not credible and/or relevant. | At least three relevant, credible sources are cited in a loosely connected, vague way. | At least three relevant, credible sources are cited in a well-connected way and elaborated on. | At least three relevant, credible sources are cited and are flawlessly integrated into the essay to support the claims made therein. |
| Organization and Effectiveness | 20.0% |
| Paragraph Development and Transitions | 10.0% | Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. | Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. | Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. | A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. | There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 10.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Format | 10.0% |
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
JohnnyDang95
Rubric_Print_Format-4.xlsx
