Benchmark - Community Teaching Plan: Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal

Course Code Class Code NRS-428VN NRS-428VN-IO1272

Criteria Percentage Content 80.0%

Planning and Topic 30.0%

EffecEveness of Teaching Plan Criteria 40.0%

TherapeuEc CommunicaEon (C 4.2 Communicate therapeuEcally with paEents.) 10.0%

OrganizaEon and EffecEveness 15.0%

OrganizaEon of Proposal, Paragraph Development, and TransiEons 10.0%

Criteria 2Mechanics of WriEng (includes spelling, punctuaEon, grammar, language use) 5.0%

Format 5.0%

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 2.0%

1

DocumentaEon of Sources (citaEons, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 3.0%

Total Weightage 100%

2

Assignment Title Benchmark - Community Teaching Plan: Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal

UnsaEsfactory (0.00%)

The chosen topic is not one of four approved topics. The epidemiologic raEonale is omi\ed.

Two or more of the assignment criteria are omi\ed.

TherapeuEc communicaEon approach is omi\ed. TherapeuEc approach is not demonstrated.

OrganizaEon of proposal is disjointed. Paragraphs and transiEons consistently lack unity and coherence. There are no apparent connecEons between ideas. TransiEons are inappropriate or lacking.

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communicaEon of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construcEon is used.

Template is not used appropriately or documentaEon format is rarely followed correctly.

3

Sources are not documented.

4

Total Points 100.0

Less Than SaEsfactory (80.00%)

The teaching plan is based on an approved topic. The epidemiological raEonal contains significant inaccuracies.

More than one of the assignment criteria are omi\ed. Overall, the teaching plan is vague. Significant informaEon is needed.

The teaching plan a\empts to communicate with an acEvity; the acEvity is not appropriate for the teaching plan. It is unclear if acEve listening techniques were used to connect with the audience. A parEal summary of how the interacEon of the audience is presented.It is unclear if nonverbal techniques were employed. More informaEon is needed.

Some degree of organizaEon is evident. Some paragraphs and transiEons may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, or cohesiveness.

Some degree of organizaEon is evident. Some paragraphs and transiEons may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, or cohesiveness. Frequent and repeEEve mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formaang is apparent.

5

DocumentaEon of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formaang errors.

6

SaEsfactory (88.00%)

The teaching plan is based on an approved topic. The epidemiological raEonal is unclear. There are some inaccuracies.

One of the assignment criteria is omi\ed or, mulEple criteria are incomplete. The teaching plan can be effecEve, but more informaEon or raEonal is needed.

The teaching plan is communicated with an acEvity that generally uses acEve listening techniques to connect with the audience. A summary of how the a\enEon of the audience was captured and how the presentaEon was concluded is presented. The teaching plan indicates that some nonverbal techniques were employed.

Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organizaEon or in their relaEonships to each other.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracEng to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Template is used, and formaang is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

7

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formaang errors may be present.

8

Good (92.00%)

The teaching plan is based on an approved topic. The epidemiological raEonal needs some detail for accuracy or clarity.

All assignment criteria are adequately completed. Some raEonal is needed for support or clarity. Overall, the teaching plan is effecEve.

The teaching plan is communicated with an acEvity that uses acEve listening techniques to connect with the audience. How the a\enEon of the audience was captured and how the presentaEon was concluded is presented. The teaching plan indicates that the use of nonverbal techniques was employed.

A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effecEve figures of speech are used.

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formaang style.

9

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

10

Excellent (100.00%) Comments

The teaching plan is based on an approved topic. The epidemiological raEonal is well-supported and relevance to the topic is demonstrated.

All assignment criteria are thoroughly completed. RaEonal and detail is provided throughout.

The teaching plan is communicated with an acEvity that uses clear acEve listening techniques to connect with the audience. A clear descripEon of how the a\enEon of the audience was captured and how the presentaEon was concluded is presented. The teaching plan thoroughly describes nonverbal techniques that were employed, such as eye contact, appropriate dress for

Proposal is well-organized and logical. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transiEon construcEon guide the reader.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, wri\en, academic English.

All format elements are correct.

11

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

12

Points Earned

13

14