Implementing Change With an Interprofessional Approach Presentation

profileDtjemrxypyt
Rubric_Print_Format-3.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
NUR-514 NUR-514-O501 Implementing Change With an Interprofessional Approach Presentation 150.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (80.00%) Satisfactory (88.00%) Good (92.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Implementing Change with an Interprofessional Approach Presentation 100.0%
Background of the Situation, Including the Rationale for Change and the Goal or Goals of Change 10.0% A description of the background of the situation, including the rationale for change and the goal or goals of change, is not included. A description of the background of the situation, including the rationale for change and the goal or goals of change, is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A description of the background of the situation, including the rationale for change and goal or the goals of change, is present. A description of the background of the situation, including the rationale for change and the goal or goals of change, is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive description of the background of the situation, including the rationale for change and the goal or goals of change, is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Key Internal and External Interprofessional Stakeholders That Should Be Involved in Change Efforts 10.0% A discussion of the key internal and external interprofessional stakeholders that should be involved in change efforts is not included. A discussion of the key internal and external interprofessional stakeholders that should be involved in change efforts is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A discussion of the key internal and external interprofessional stakeholders that should be involved in change efforts is present. A discussion of the key internal and external interprofessional stakeholders that should be involved in change efforts is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive discussion of the key internal and external interprofessional stakeholders that should be involved in change efforts is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Appropriate Change Theory or Model That Could Be Used to Achieve Results 10.0% A discussion of an appropriate change theory or model that could be used to achieve results is not included. A discussion of an appropriate change theory or model that could be used to achieve results is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A discussion of an appropriate change theory or model that could be used to achieve results is present. A discussion of an appropriate change theory or model that could be used to achieve results is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive discussion of an appropriate change theory or model that could be used to achieve results is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Outline for Initiating Change 10.0% An outline for initiating change is not included. An outline for initiating change is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. An outline for initiating change is present. An outline for initiating change is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive outline for initiating change is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Impact to the Organization if the Change Initiative Is Unsuccessful Again and Potential Steps the Interprofessional Team Could Take 5.0% A discussion of the impact to the organization if the change initiative is unsuccessful again and potential steps the interprofessional team could take is not included. A discussion of the impact to the organization if the change initiative is unsuccessful again and potential steps the interprofessional team could take is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A discussion of the impact to the organization if the change initiative is unsuccessful again and potential steps the interprofessional team could take is present. A discussion of the impact to the organization if the change initiative is unsuccessful again and potential steps the interprofessional team could take is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive discussion of the impact to the organization if the change initiative is unsuccessful again and potential steps the interprofessional team could take is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Required Sources 5.0% Sources are not included. Number of required sources is only partially met. Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate. Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Presentation of Content 20.0% The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. The project includes some persuasive information. The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other. The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. The project includes persuasive information from reliable sources. The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
Layout 10.0% The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) 10.0% Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%