| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| ELM-580 | ELM-580-O500 | Integrating Writing | 80.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (69.00%) | Approaching (74.00%) | Acceptable (87.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 100.0% |
| COE Lesson Plan Template | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Uses the COE Lesson Plan Template and Class Profile. Lesson plan components are missing or are inadequately addressed and do not include details on an appropriate writing activity. | Uses the COE Lesson Plan Template and Class Profile. All lesson plan components are addressed. Details are incongruent with the text identified in Topic 2; includes minimal details on a writing activity. | Uses the COE Lesson Plan Template and Class profile. All lesson plan components are clearly addressed in the design of an original lesson to include the text identified in Topic 2 and an appropriate writing activity. | Uses the COE Lesson Plan Template and Class Profile. All lesson plan components are thoroughly addressed in the design of a thoughtful and original lesson plan to include the text identified in Topic 2 and a creative writing activity. |
| Questioning Strategies | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Lesson plan includes unprepared and weak questioning strategies that poorly activate students prior knowledge, higher-order thinking in writing, and is missing components of engaging them in the learning process. | Lesson plan includes partially proficient or underdeveloped questioning strategies that somewhat activate students prior knowledge, higher-order thinking in writing, and vaguely engages them in the learning process. | Lesson plan includes solid and realistic questioning strategies that directly activate students prior knowledge, higher-order thinking in writing, and clearly engages them in the learning process. | Lesson plan includes exceptional and meaningful questioning strategies that skillfully activate students prior knowledge, higher-order thinking in writing, and thoughtfully engage them in the learning process. |
| Various Forms of Writing | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Lesson plan shows an incomplete and poor attempt at focusing on creativity and weakly engages students with various forms of writing (e.g., poetry, short story, personal narrative). | Lesson plan shows a beginning-level attempt at focusing on creativity or does not adequately engage students with various forms of writing (e.g., poetry, short story, personal narrative). | Lesson plan successfully and solidly focuses on creativity and engages students with various forms of writing (e.g., poetry, short story, personal narrative) with clear and direct understanding. | Lesson plan innovatively and skillfully focuses on creativity and engages students with various forms of writing (e.g., poetry, short story, personal narrative) with thorough and extensive understanding. |
| Reflection | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Reflection includes a rudimentary and unprepared description of strategies that omit components of introducing the writing process, why the writing activity chosen is relevant to meet the diverse needs of students, and how the writing process supports verbal and nonverbal forms of communication. | Reflection includes an inconsistent or marginal description of strategies that inadequately introduce the writing process, why the writing activity chosen is relevant to meet the diverse needs of students, and how the writing process vaguely supports verbal and nonverbal forms of communication. | Reflection includes a consistent and realistic description of strategies that directly introduce the writing process, why the writing activity chosen is relevant to meet the diverse needs of students, and how the writing process solidly supports verbal and nonverbal forms of communication. | Reflection includes an accomplished and exemplary description of strategies that skillfully introduce the writing process, why the writing activity chosen is superior to meet the diverse needs of students, and how the writing process thoughtfully supports verbal and nonverbal forms of communication. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although several minor formatting errors are present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
bluskeet33
Rubric_Print_Format-16.xlsx
