| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| NUR-590 | NUR-590-O500 | Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation | 120.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | 2: Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%) | 3: Satisfactory (88.00%) | 4: Good (92.00%) | 5: Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 100.0% |
| Introduction | 5.0% | An introduction is not included. | The introduction omits key aspects of the PICOT and fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and PICOT statement for the presentation. | The introduction generally presents the PICOT statement and most of the fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and for the presentation. | The introduction is adequate. The PICOT statement and the fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and PICOT statement for the presentation are discussed. | The introduction is succinct, captures the attention of the audience, clearly identifies PICOT statement and the fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and for the presentation. |
| Organizational and Cultural Readiness | 10.0% | The discussion on the organizational culture and readiness is not included. | The discussion on the organizational culture and readiness is incomplete. | The organizational culture and readiness are generally discussed and provide insight into some of the challenges faced by the organization. | The organizational culture and readiness are adequately discussed and provide the necessary insight into the organization challenges. | The organizational culture and readiness are thoroughly discussed and provide insight into the organization challenges. |
| Problem Statement and Literature Review | 15.0% | The problem statement is not clearly stated. Research from the literature review is not included. | The problem statement outlines the issue. Support from the research from the literature review is inconsistent. | The problem statement summarizes the issue and uses evidence-based support from some of the literature review to rationalize and justify the problem. The research from the literature review provides general support overall. | The problem describes the issue using evidence-based support from the literature review to rationalize and justify the problem. The research from the literature review is current, relevant, and used to provide adequate rationale and support throughout. | The problem statement is consistent throughout the presentation and concisely describes the issue using strong evidence-based support from the literature review to rationalize and justify the problem. The research from the literature review is current, relevant, and used to provide excellent rationale and support throughout. |
| Change Model or Framework | 10.0% | The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are not described. | The selected model or framework is and its application to the proposed implementation are only partially described. | The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are generally described. | The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are adequately described. | The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are thoroughly described. |
| Implementation Plan | 10.0% | The implementation plan is not described. | The implementation plan is only partially described. | The implementation plan is generally described and provides an overall outline for the various aspects. | The implementation plan is adequately described and provides the details for the various aspects. | The implementation plan is thoroughly described and provides the details for the various aspects. |
| Evaluation Plan | 10.0% | The evaluation plan is not described. | The evaluation plan is only partially described. | The evaluation plan is outlined and provides general information for most aspects. | The evaluation plan is adequately described and provides key information for the various aspects. | The evaluation plan is thoroughly described and provides the details for the various aspects. |
| Conclusion | 5.0% | A conclusion is not presented. | The conclusion mentions some aspects of the presentation, but there are some key aspects missing. | The conclusion outlines the broad aspects of the presentation. | The conclusion summarizes the key points of the presentation in a concise manner. | The conclusion is short, clear and summarizes the key points of the presentation in a powerful and memorable way. |
| Research
| 5.0% | No outside sources were used to support the assignment. | Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent. | Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness. | Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. | Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. |
| Presentation
PowerPoint, speaker notes, Loom voice over or video.
| 10.0% | The submission is incoherent, contains major inconsistencies, is not presented effectively, or is missing a substantial amount of the required elements. | The submission is ineffective, contains multiple inconsistencies, or is missing a few of the required elements. | The submission contains minor inconsistencies that are not overly distracting. Presentation contains a majority of the required elements. | The submission is presented effectively and contains all of the required elements. | The submission is presented effectively, and all of the required elements creatively contribute to the presentation of the concepts. |
| Aesthetic Quality | 5.0% | Design is cluttered. Materials detract from the content or the purpose of presentation is low quality. | Design detracts from purpose. Text and visuals are too simplistic, cluttered, and busy. Little or no creativity or inventiveness is present. | Design is fairly clean, with a few exceptions. Materials add to, not detract from the presentation. Materials used were quality products and easy to see or hear. | Design is appropriate and integrates a variety of objects, charts, and graphs to amplify the message. | Design is clean. Skillful handling of text and visuals creates a distinctive and effective presentation. Overall, effective and functional audio, text, or visuals are evident. |
| Synthesis | 5.0% | Synthesis does not successfully integrate ideas to form a cohesive whole. The combination of elements is not logical and/or verifiable. | Synthesis integrates ideas inadequately. The combination of elements is not logical. | Synthesis integrates ideas but does not adequately form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements at times is confusing. | Synthesis integrates ideas to form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements is logical and justified. | Synthesis is unique. Synthesis shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together. The combination of elements is verified. |
| Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use.
| 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Documentation of Sources
Citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.
| 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Dtjemrxypyt
Rubric_Print_Format-12.xlsx
