Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory

profilehferrer
Rubric_Print_Format-11.pdf

Course Code Class Code PHI-413V PHI-413V-O502

Criteria Percentage Content 90.0%

Chris@an Perspec@ve of Spirituality and Ethics in Contrast to Postmodern Rela@vism 30.0%

Scien@sm and Arguments 30.0%

Personal Perspec@ve and Worldview 30.0%

Organiza@on, Effec@veness, and Format 10.0%

Mechanics of Wri@ng (includes spelling, punctua@on, grammar, language use) 5.0%

Documenta@on of Sources (cita@ons, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0%

Total Weightage 100%

1

Assignment Title Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory

Unsa@sfactory (0.00%)

Explana@on of the Chris@an perspec@ve of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspec@ve of postmodern rela@vism is incomplete or insufficient.

Explana@on of scien@sm or the explana@ons of two main arguments against scien@sm are inaccurate. Details are not supported.

Worldview ques@ons are not fully answered.

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communica@on of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construc@on is used.

Sources are not documented.

2

Total Points 100.0

Less Than Sa@sfactory (65.00%)

Explana@on of the Chris@an perspec@ve of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspec@ve of postmodern rela@vism is unclear. Explana@on is not supported by topic study materials.

Descrip@on of scien@sm is accurate. Explana@ons of two main arguments against scien@sm are unclear. Details are not clearly supported by topic study materials.

Each of the worldview ques@ons is answered but is lacking a personal connec@on or clarity.

Frequent and repe@@ve mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Documenta@on of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous forma]ng errors.

3

Sa@sfactory (75.00%)

Explana@on of the Chris@an perspec@ve of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspec@ve of postmodern rela@vism is clear. Explana@on is not supported by topic study materials.

Explana@on of scien@sm is clear. Explana@ons of two main arguments against scien@sm are clear. Details are supported by topic study materials.

Each of the worldview ques@ons is answered with personal connec@on.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distrac@ng to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some forma]ng errors may be present.

4

Good (85.00%)

Explana@on of the Chris@an perspec@ve of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspec@ve of postmodern rela@vism is clear and detailed. Explana@on is supported by topic study materials.

Explana@on of scien@sm is clear and accurate. Explana@ons of two main arguments against scien@sm are clear. Details are clearly supported by topic study materials.

Each of the worldview ques@ons is answered clearly and with personal connec@on.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effec@ve sentence structures and figures of speech.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

5

Excellent (100.00%) Comments

Explana@on of the Chris@an perspec@ve of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspec@ve of postmodern rela@vism is clear, detailed, and demonstrates a deep understanding of the subject. Explana@on is supported by topic study materials.

Explana@on of scien@sm is clear and accurate. Explana@ons of two main arguments against scien@sm are clear and insighcul. Details are clearly supported by topic study materials.

Each of the worldview ques@ons is answered clearly and with deep personal insight.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, wriden, academic English.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

6

Points Earned

7