Sustaining Improvements

Sustaining Improvements - Rubric

E�ectiveness of Action Plans and Supporting Data 10 points

Criteria Description

Effectiveness of Action Plans and Supporting Data

5. Target 10 points

The narrative clearly, accurately, and thoroughly addresses the effectiveness of the

CIP’s action plans and skillfully describes results or data to support position.

4. Acceptable 8.7 points

The narrative completely addresses the effectiveness of the CIP’s action plans and

directly describes results or data to support position.

3. Approaching 7.4 points

The narrative incompletely addresses the effectiveness of the CIP’s action plans and

somewhat describes results or data to support position.

2. Insufficient 6.9 points

The narrative inadequately addresses the effectiveness of the CIP’s action plans and

poorly describes results or data to support position.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Results Reported to Stakeholders and Evaluation 10 points

Criteria Description

Results Reported to Stakeholders and Evaluation

5. Target 10 points

The narrative proficiently describes the process for reporting to stakeholders

regarding the overall results and an expert evaluation of these methods.

4. Acceptable 8.7 points

Collapse All

The narrative accurately describes the process for reporting to stakeholders

regarding the overall results and an evaluation of these methods.

3. Approaching 7.4 points

The narrative minimally describes reporting to stakeholders regarding the overall

results and an unclear evaluation of these methods.

2. Insufficient 6.9 points

The narrative inaccurately describes reporting to stakeholders regarding the overall

results and an incomplete evaluation of these methods.

1. No Submission 0 points

Continued Promotion of Change and Sustain Results 10 points

Criteria Description

Continued Promotion of Change and Sustain Results

5. Target 10 points

Narrative skillfully addresses how leadership, faculty, and staff will continue to

promote change and sustain the results.

4. Acceptable 8.7 points

Narrative competently addresses how leadership, faculty, and staff will continue to

promote change and sustain the results.

3. Approaching 7.4 points

Narrative partially addresses how leadership, faculty, and staff will continue to

promote change and sustain the results.

2. Insufficient 6.9 points

Narrative vaguely addresses how leadership, faculty, and staff will continue to

promote change and sustain the results.

Additional Resources 10 points

Criteria Description

Additional Resources

5. Target 10 points

Narrative comprehensively addresses if they will need additional resources and

why.

4. Acceptable 8.7 points

Narrative directly addresses if they will need additional resources and why.

3. Approaching 7.4 points

Narrative superficially addresses if they will need additional resources and why.

2. Insufficient 6.9 points

Narrative poorly addresses if they will need additional resources and why.

1. No Submission 0 points

Organization 2.5 points

Criteria Description

Organization

5. Target 2.5 points

The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas

that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides

the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The narrative is within the

required word count.

4. Acceptable 2.18 points

The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The

content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The narrative is

within a reasonable range of the required word count.

3. Approaching 1.85 points

The content is not adequately organized even though it provides the audience with

a sense of the main idea. The narrative may not be within a reasonable range of the

required word count.

2. Insufficient 1.72 points

An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The

ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other; or the

essay is widely outside of the required word count.

Documentation of Sources 2.5 points

Criteria Description

citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and

style

5. Target 2.5 points

All sources are credible, appropriate, and strongly support the submission. All

required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission.

4. Acceptable 2.18 points

All sources are credible, adequate, and support the submission. All required aspects

of APA format are correct within the submission.

3. Approaching 1.85 points

Some citations may be missing where needed; or some of the sources do not

support the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but some aspects are

missing or mistaken.

2. Insufficient 1.72 points

Many citations are missing where needed; or many of the sources are inappropriate

for the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but many aspects are

missing or mistaken.

1. No Submission 0 points

Mechanics of Writing 5 points

Criteria Description

includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use

5. Target 5 points

Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-

developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are

varied and engaging.

4. Acceptable 4.35 points

Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder

comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some

practice and content-related language.

3. Approaching 3.7 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent

language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking.

2. Insufficient 3.45 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used.

1. No Submission 0 points

Total 50 points